Posted today at Directions Magazine:
USGS in 2007: Moving Forward
February’s Brooks Act Litigation: What Geospatial Practitioners Need to Know (updated since originally published)
Responses on the Brooks Act Litigation
OGC Demonstrates Sensor Web Decision Support Services
Interested? We have a feed of articles from Directions Magazine or you can subscribe to e-mail newsletters.
A lawsuit enters court in early February that may significantly impact federal contracting for mapping. It may put federal projects, including those that are not survying related, under the oversight of surveyors. We’ve done our best to lay out the facts for those in the industry at Directions Magazine‘s February’s Brooks Act Litigation: What Geospatial Practitioners Need to Know.
A tech Q&A column in the Star Tribune (Minneapolis/St. Paul) had Randy Salas respond to a question about finding corners of a property by going to Google Map Mania and suggesting, per Mike Pegg, that the queriers try ACME Mapper. While I’m sure this was all done in good faith, the message about the validity of such work didn’t seem to come through.
That’s where registered land surveyor Thomas Veenker, land survey coordinator for Aitkin County, Minn. chimed in. He notes that you can use Google’s database to find such coordinates, but finding them at home with a handheld GPS is innaccurate. The creator of ACME Mapper points out that lat/lon are not legally binding descriptions of corner locations (those are based of distance and direction from a survey monument).
This is a great teachable moment and I’m pleased (1) a land surveyor piped up, (2) how surveying is done was described and (3) Salas offers a lesson:
So, the lesson here is not to use online mapping tools as legally binding applications but as the helpful aids they are intended to be…