Google announced new datasets including demographics, parcels, traffic counts in its for fee Google Earth Pro this month. Why? What market is the company looking capture? Are those data enough? And, do they belong in Google Earth Pro? Our editors explore the new additions.
Subscribe to Podcast RSS
Listen Now (to download, right click on the link at left and choose "save target as")
Read the show notes
Missed any podcasts? Want to subscribe via iTunes, Yahoo, etc? Here’s the index.
by Adena Schutzberg on 06/29 at 01:00 AM |
Comments |
Narrow your search further:
3d,
demographics,
directions on the news podcast,
esri,
google,
google earth,
health,
location intelligence,
microsoft,
traffic,
weather
Michael Fassnacht, in an article published by Advertising Age (April 13) entitled, "The Death of Consumer Segmentation," put on a full frontal assault challenging the use of geodemographics and marketing segmentation, and by association business GIS. He references a "well-known fashion retailer" (but doesn’t name names) that supposedly spent big bucks on, what I assume, was a desktop mapping system replete with demographics and psychographic data. He makes the following points:
- "The rather static definition of consumer segments is becoming less
reliable in our extremely volatile society, especially in today’s economic climate. A consumer’s lifetime value may have decreased
significantly in the past six months, a fact not reflected by any segmentation method."
- "Consumers are never just part of one segment. Rather, they feel, rightfully, that they belong to a multitude of segments. They can be the professional executive in the morning, the boyish sports fan in the evening, the churchgoing father figure on Sunday."
- "Consumers are gaining more control of any marketing activity…they like to receive relevant information, but even more, they prefer to choose their own relevant information"
He goes on to reference Apple and Amazon that don’t bet the farm on market segmentation. "[They] are not masters of consumer segmentation but experts in building relevant products that consumers choose. Their marketing communication is segment-based but does not depend on pursuing an ever-increasing level of micro-segment-specific relevance. They are far more focused on building and communicating relevance relationships than in micro-segmenting consumers."
So, Fassnacht appears to be arguing, not to abandon micro-marketing, but to say that much finer market segmentation may be necessary, and, as he describers, consumers engage in "self-segmentation." I would argue that in our mobile society we are much more geographically disperse and at any given time will be or should be marketed to in both a geospatial and time-relevant context. Hence the boom in location-based advertising. What we as marketers need is a better way of capturing the geographic dispersion of the marketing and the means to target appropriate messages.
by Joe Francica on 04/16 at 09:03 AM |
Comments |
Geospatial data are relatively easy to obtain in the U.S. but what about in the Asia Pacific region where government policy differs widely from country to country. In fact, today’s challenges in the region have moved from acquiring the spatial foundation data (streets, basic demographics, and political boundaries) to data with finer demographic and geographic granularity. Editor in chief Joe Francica spoke with Sean Richards, director of product management for Pitney Bowes Business Insight (PBBI) in Brisbane, Australia, and Scott Robinson, director of global data products for PBBI about the obstacles to success and whether countries recognize the benefit of a more open data policy.
Subscribe to Podcast RSS
Listen Now (to download, right click on the link at left and choose "save target as")
Read the supporting interview with addition insights and comments
Missed any podcasts? Want to subscribe via iTunes, Yahoo, etc? Here’s the index with all the info.
by Joe Francica on 04/14 at 06:07 AM |
Comments |