Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (88)
planetgs.com (78)
www.thegisforum.com (68)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
manomano.livejournal.com (31)
Our Points
Tuesday, June 9. 2009

Podcast: Spatial Databases: A Commodity?

Open Source Oracle Geospatial Business

This week's question: Is the spatial database a commodity? With all the big database players storing and querying spatial data and several open source offerings in the market, is spatial no longer special when in comes to the database world? Is it time to "stop getting excited" about the addition of spatial support and simply use the technology?


Subscribe to Podcast RSS

Listen Now (to download, right click on the link at left and choose "save target as")

Read the show notes

Missed any podcasts? Want to subscribe via iTunes, Yahoo, etc? Here's the index.

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in Open Source, Microsoft, Oracle, Databases, Directions on the News Podcast, Geospatial Business at 01:00 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0) | Bookmark and Share

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Spatial databases COULD be a commodity if ESRI weren't walking around with a wet blanket to drop over any activity that ventures away from their platform.

ESRI's sufficient market share and a broad 'intel network' of geospatial experts. When an end-user of any size or importance begins thinking about geospatial investments, ESRI knows...and steps into the mix.

Soon as that camel is in the tent, you can say goodbye to a non-ESRI spatial database as the foundation.

ESRI's most cherished leverage is control over the core data format - and SQL/ORACLE/POSTGres, etc., enable geospatial apps that don't need ESRI.

- result: Spatial DB versions have been around for a while. If they were truly successful in penetrating the market, you'd see Oracle Spatial under every City and Utility GIS in the market.
#1 Archie Belaney on 2009-06-09 09:27 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
Julian Bourne about Podcast: Implications for Twitter's Geolocation API
November 24
Great podcast - good point about time [...]


Jeremy Heffner about Podcast: Implications for Twitter's Geolocation API
November 24
Great topic. I wrote a blog post about [...]


Andrew Turner about Apps.gov Prices for Google API: Nearly $1million
November 23
Make sure and check the terms of these [...]


Briantist about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]


SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]


Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]


Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]


Amazon Recommendations