Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (88)
planetgs.com (75)
www.thegisforum.com (67)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
georezo.net (30)
Our Points
Thursday, May 14. 2009

Should DigitalGlobe IPO Change thinking on GeoEye?

Geospatial Business

Somes say yes. Rich Smith of Motley Fool compares the two companies and says "no." Nice tables compare 2008 and 2009 revenues.

The IPO launched today at $19 above initial expected range of $16-$18 and raised $279.3m, more than expected. The stock begins trading today.

- Reuters
- Bloomberg

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in DigitalGlobe, Geospatial Business at 08:07 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0) | Bookmark and Share

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

The bitter taste of long-term debt will last long after the Google-factor coolness has melted away.

It. Costs. Too. Much. To. Launch. And. Operate. A. Satellite. To. Be. Profitable. Without. Extraordinary. Financial. Measures.

Things like going bankrupt and restructuring debt multiple times to get the carrying cost and debt service off the books...so you're 'flying the bird for free'
#1 Anon Mousse on 2009-05-14 20:57 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
Andrew Turner about Apps.gov Prices for Google API: Nearly $1million
November 23
Make sure and check the terms of these [...]


Briantist about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]


SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]


Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]


Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]


Adena Schutzberg about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
You are correct! [...]


Archie Belaney about Update 5: AT&T Sues Verizon over "Map for That" Map Ads
November 19
If you're advertising 3g coverage is [...]


Amazon Recommendations