Tuesday, May 22. 2007

EULAs Still Confusing for Google, Microsoft APIs

I had several conversations with Intergraph’s product executives to help clarify how the licensing would work for users who wanted to leverage Microsoft or Google API’s with GeoMedia (GeoMedia will use a control to instantiate GE or VE from within a GeoMedia client) since there are restrictions on the usage of data as per the API agreements. Each exec supplied basically the same answer that the Intergraph legal team was working through the issue with regard to the pricing and end-user licensing agreement (EULA). However, though it seems that it may be of minimal cost to users like local governments, who wish to use the API’s to support their community services, it is not clear on how commercial users could utlize the same functionality. Intergraph may end up asking users to deal directly with those supplying the web service.

This is not just an issue for Intergraph users but for others who have varying business models that want to leverage the API’s for commercial or public usage. This has to be clearly defined because many people want to exploit the geospatial data/visualization tools that are offered by Microsoft and Google as an embedded object from within other applications. More data will be added by the big mapping portals and more layers of "legalize" will likely occur and as more data is contributed to the library of "community contributed" geospatial information. It's a scary thought but there is already an assumption, especially by those seeing the Intergraph demo, that the data is free.

Posted by Joe Francica in Google, Microsoft, Intergraph, Intergraph 2007 at 22:25 | Comments (3) | Trackbacks (0) |

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

I'd love to hear what the lawyers say, both gaia and world wind were told it wasn't legal to show Google imagery in thier apps (by google), even though world wind is OS and non-profit.

#1 Bull (Link) on 2007-05-23 11:43 (Reply)

Microsoft has a clear terms of use for Virtual Earth. Not sure what the Intergraph folks are confused about.

http://dev.live.com/terms/

Good luck trying to use Google though.

#2 James Fee (Link) on 2007-05-23 18:25 (Reply)

agreed, ms has much clearer terms then google. google asked us to remove any google links from Arc2Earth, even for non-profits and educational users

also, gaia was trying to access the Google Earth image set by emulating the logon and data access procedure. this is different from accessing the map tiles used by Google Maps especially since the imagery is not watermarked in the GE store

cheers
brian

#3 Brian Flood (Link) on 2007-05-24 10:34 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to	[ Top level ]#1: Bull on 2007-05-23 11:43 #2: James Fee on 2007-05-23 18:25   #2.1: Brian Flood on 2007-05-24 10:34
Comment	Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_. Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above:
	Remember Information?   Subscribe to this entry