Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (88)
planetgs.com (77)
www.thegisforum.com (71)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
www.bloglines.com (27)
planetgs.com (77)
www.thegisforum.com (71)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
www.bloglines.com (27)
Our Points
|
Friday, July 10. 2009
|
 |
Update: Let them read and comment on U.S. patent applications
Bad news: the Peer to Patent website was shut down last month (and apparently almost no one noticed). Officially, the pilot was closed, but it doesn't look good for a reopening. Mike Masnick suggests that there was simply not enough incentive for people to review patents before they were given. Comments to his post point out the interface for the site was poor.
- Tech Dirt
--- update 6/18/07 -----
Update 6/18/07: The Peer to Patent Project went live on Friday. Five patent apps are available for review with more to come.
- c|net
---original post 3/5/07---
The Washington Post explains a trial system that puts US patent applications on the Web for all to see and on which to comment. The wiki-like program is aimed at weeding out well, unneeded patents, early on the in the process and getting input for many experts. In the past only the patent examiners reviewed patents.
The program will begin with 250 patents focussing on software design and only applicants who agree to have their patents in the online system will be used. So far, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle and others have said "ok" to that. A reputation system will help push top comments to the patent examiner who will ultimately say if the patent goes forward.
This is a step forward, though it will take a lot of diligence for the experts to read, understand and comment on patents. I wonder if this system was in place if the Web mapping and real estate patents that causing us trouble in the geospatial arena would have been stopped? It's hard to know.
If this pilot is picked up, what will our (and other) communities do? Would we as a community consider funding an expert (or a few) to review these documents? Do you think private companies will create positions just for this sort of work to look out for things that could potentially shut them down?
Update 6/18/07: The Peer to Patent Project went live on Friday. Five patent apps are available for review with more to come.
- c|net
---original post 3/5/07---
The Washington Post explains a trial system that puts US patent applications on the Web for all to see and on which to comment. The wiki-like program is aimed at weeding out well, unneeded patents, early on the in the process and getting input for many experts. In the past only the patent examiners reviewed patents.
The program will begin with 250 patents focussing on software design and only applicants who agree to have their patents in the online system will be used. So far, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle and others have said "ok" to that. A reputation system will help push top comments to the patent examiner who will ultimately say if the patent goes forward.
This is a step forward, though it will take a lot of diligence for the experts to read, understand and comment on patents. I wonder if this system was in place if the Web mapping and real estate patents that causing us trouble in the geospatial arena would have been stopped? It's hard to know.
If this pilot is picked up, what will our (and other) communities do? Would we as a community consider funding an expert (or a few) to review these documents? Do you think private companies will create positions just for this sort of work to look out for things that could potentially shut them down?
Posted by Adena Schutzberg
in Patents
at
13:02
| Comments (0)
| Trackbacks (0)
|
|
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
Archives
Archives
Comments
Briantist about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]
SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]
Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]
Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]
Adena Schutzberg about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
You are correct! [...]
Archie Belaney about Update 5: AT&T Sues Verizon over "Map for That" Map Ads
November 19
If you're advertising 3g coverage is [...]
Maitri about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
Hey, I know Yu-Feng! We went to grad [...]
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]
SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]
Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]
Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]
Adena Schutzberg about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
You are correct! [...]
Archie Belaney about Update 5: AT&T Sues Verizon over "Map for That" Map Ads
November 19
If you're advertising 3g coverage is [...]
Maitri about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
Hey, I know Yu-Feng! We went to grad [...]
Amazon Recommendations
