Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (88)
planetgs.com (75)
www.thegisforum.com (70)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
www.bloglines.com (27)
Our Points
Monday, February 27. 2006

AutoCAD 2007 Format: Locked?

Evan Yares, lead guru at the Open Design Alliance, the guys who make libraries that read and write CAD formats like DWG, posts on his blog that the new version of AutoCAD due soon may be an Autodesk only deal.

He notes that "locks" in the file format and restrictions on reverse engineer may make it impossible for his, or perhaps any organization, to read or write the format, forcing users to use Autodesk products with that data.

Via Tenlinks

Posted by Adena Schutzberg at 13:35 | Comments (2) | Trackback (1) | Bookmark and Share

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

Closed, and open, and better, oh my!
I have a love/hate relationship with Autodesk. One on hand, I love their MapGuide product . On the other hand, I hate the DWG file format. With each release, I have to worry about whether I’ll be able make Engineering’s data available...
Weblog: Random Nodes ...Jason Birch's geospatial ramblings
Tracked: Mar 04, 18:04

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

And why is ESRI pushing the geodatabase?
#1 Atanas Entchev (Link) on 2006-02-27 13:50 (Reply)
Yares has been saying they were going to do this since 2004 at every CAD users conference he has been at including Autodesk University until he got banned. Some people actually listened and aren't facing this problem having moved to better platforms or stayed with older versions. If Open DWG doesn't find a way around this it will be very interesting to see what happens to all those companies that will now be locked into AutoDesk no matter what they want to do.
#2 Andy (Link) on 2006-02-27 14:26 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
Andrew Turner about Apps.gov Prices for Google API: Nearly $1million
November 23
Make sure and check the terms of these [...]


Briantist about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]


SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]


Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]


Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]


Adena Schutzberg about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
You are correct! [...]


Archie Belaney about Update 5: AT&T Sues Verizon over "Map for That" Map Ads
November 19
If you're advertising 3g coverage is [...]


Amazon Recommendations