Researchers published two studies this week that included important maps. One highlighted the human impact on the world's oceans. A second documented the past, current and future vulnerability of the U.S. population to natural disasters. Press coverage of the first study was considerable, with the map distributed far and wide on the Web and beyond. Coverage of the second was limited to the scientific and geographic press. Why the disparity? Our editors review the maps and offer their thoughts.
Subscribe to Podcast RSS
Listen Now (to download, right click on the link at left and choose "save target as")
Read the show notes
Missed any podcasts? Want to subscribe via iTunes, Yahoo, etc?
Here's the index with all the info.
Comments
October 13
Chris,
You said it far better than I [...]
Chris about Pretty Picture vs. Satellite Imagery in Use
October 13
The takeaway for me, and I think what [...]
Daniel about Pretty Picture vs. Satellite Imagery in Use
October 13
I suppose that the attention the image [...]
huh? about Update: Siderelis Named first DOI GIO
October 12
Siderelis? What am I missing? Sam nailed [...]
Adena Schutzberg about Pretty Picture vs. Satellite Imagery in Use
October 12
Daniel,
I guess I was unclear. My [...]
Daniel about Pretty Picture vs. Satellite Imagery in Use
October 12
Once raw samples are formally available [...]
siva about Flash in Local Gov Websites
October 10
What would be very useful is to have a [...]