Monday, November 2. 2009

Cloudmade Chairman/CEO on How Google is Blowing it With Mapping Devs

Sadly, Juha Christensen does not identify himself as Chairman/CEO in the post on his blog. Further, he didn't identify that it was an e-mail sent to partners; I learned that from Mike Arrington at TechCrunch, who reprinted it at his request.

His starting point:

Google betting on one-size-fits all model
Google is betting on building a horizontal, local search franchise. I know that sounds like an oxymoron, but please read on, it gets clearer. Google is building a one-size-fits-all set of services around mapping, and will serve the masses with those. Think about Google Maps, Latitude or Earth. They are horizontal one-size-fits-all web apps with little or no segmentation. Everyone uses the same app.


Meanwhile, in the process of building out end-user applications rather than sticking to being a platform player, Google is causing considerable collateral damage. Its move into the territory normally occupied by mobile operators, OEMs and small, medium and large developers is turning the marketplace against itself. The honeymoon is over and the do-no-evil days have ended. Google has declared any monetizable pocket in tech a target, including the key franchises of Apple, Microsoft, the mobile operators and now also mobile application developers. The problem with Google’s approach is, the value is not in horizontal services, but in leveraging the democratizing effect of the app stores to use the 100,000+ vertical apps as a way to divide the market into tiny segments and let them flourish and gain traction.

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in Google, Open Source at 06:00 | Comments (3) | Trackbacks (0) |

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

I suggest people read this article - very interesting with regards to how Google are probably working with mobile operators via Android by providing a cheaper than free model...

http://abovethecrowd.com/2009/10/29/google-redefines-disruption-the-%E2%80%9Cless-than-free%E2%80%9D-business-model/

#1 Mike Saunt (Link) on 2009-11-02 13:44 (Reply)

Cheaper than free -

I like that for a competitive advantage. Pay people in kind or in future leverage.

Remember folks, they're not evil. Really.

#1.1 Archie Belaney on 2009-11-02 17:41 (Reply)

Great post, and "Cheaper than free" is a better wording. The original wording, "Less than free", can be misinterpreted. Like so: "I was intrigued by this free product, but it turned out it wasn't really free. It was less than free."

#1.1.1 atanas entchev (Link) on 2009-11-03 09:46 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to	[ Top level ]#1: Mike Saunt on 2009-11-02 13:44   #1.1: Archie Belaney on 2009-11-02 17:41     #1.1.1: atanas entchev on 2009-11-03 09:46
Comment	Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_. Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above:
	Remember Information?   Subscribe to this entry