Monday, September 14. 2009

Would the ideas of Gov 2.0 work for business?

Watching the Gov 2.0 Summit presentations this past week tweaked my mind about what technology should do, not just for government agencies, but for business. Tim O'Reilly's model of "government as a platform" goes directly to some of the business process improvement methodologies that businesses have longed to attain.

O'Reilly uses the analogy of the Apple iPhone as a platform for applications developed by programmers outside of Apple as his vision for what government should be able to facilitate for citizenry: build the platform...let the citizens take it from there. And he is not just hoping that federal agencies will find ways to work better together but for intergovernmental agencies as well such as federal to state, state to local, local to citizens, etc.

Would this model work for business? Would businesses share data and some of their internal IT platforms with partners, perhaps in a cloud computing environment? Some already put data "outside the firewall" for sharing but how many businesses build their IT model with the idea that shared data is a foundation for business expansion and efficiency?

Walmart was first recognized for using RFID technology to monitor inventory and "advising" their suppliers to adopt ways to conform with its inventory and logistics control procedures. Inventory data was shared with suppliers; orders were automatically placed and shipped to distribution centers. But for O'Reilly's vision to be transformed into standard business practice I think an entirely new level of trust might have to be developed between business partners.

That's not to say that it can't be done and in this economic climate it may be a necessity. It's a model that needs more thought and exploration. Andrea DiMaio of Gartner provided the reasons why government cannot act as a platform and you can use these arguments as a check list as to why business platforms may or may not work.

Posted by Joe Francica in Location Intelligence, Apple, Cloud Computing at 11:12 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0) |

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Sharing? Openly? Between businesses?

Sure, it used to be called EDE but now web systems are interconnected almost in an instant. And fortunately may be disconnected just as quickly...

As for WalMart, they didn't 'advise' their suppliers (although I suspect the quotes were meant to imply sarcasm, which is certainly warranted) to begin RFID - they 'directed' them to do so. All shipments after 'X date' must have these capabilities [or you're no longer our supplier because we're really huge and we can always find an alternate if you don't do exactly as we say] to help us track our inventory.

#1 Archie Belaney on 2009-09-14 17:54 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to	[ Top level ]#1: Archie Belaney on 2009-09-14 17:54
Comment	Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_. Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above:
	Remember Information?   Subscribe to this entry