Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (161)
planetgs.com (113)
www.thegisforum.com (80)
www.bloglines.com (45)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
Our Points
Tuesday, June 23. 2009

Google Working on Landmark Recognition - Relation to Google Map?

Google shared that it's working to identify landmarks on images in part by starting with geocoded images on Picassa and Panaramio. Clint Boulton wonders what it'll be useful for beyond grade school homework projects. I know - Google can do what Bing already does (though apparently using different methodology) adding landmark images to its mapping app.

- Google Watch Blog at EWeek

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in Google at 07:44 | Comments (4) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

On a somewhat related note, Microsoft has a patent application for landmark-based routing.
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=YM6xAAAAEBAJ&dq=landmark-based+routing
#1 Kevin on 2009-06-23 08:29 (Reply)
Kevin, thanks for pointing that out. Landmark-based routing is exactly what I came here to suggest. I'm glad to see that Microsoft is getting the ball rolling. A lot of people in real life don't navigate (or give directions) by street names at all, but rather with directions like "turn left at the church." Incorporating geocoded recognized landmarks into routing would be a nice feature for those people.
#1.1 Andy Woodruff (Link) on 2009-06-23 09:50 (Reply)
Andy,

Microsoft is already doing that with "business landmarks." See: http://apb.directionsmag.com/archives/5917-Landmarks-on-Bing-Maps-Directions.html. This new feature using images is more about what I'd call "Touristy" landmarks.

I fully agree it's easier to turn left at the red brick church than on Church street!
#1.1.1 Adena Schutzberg (Link) on 2009-06-23 10:02 (Reply)
Oh, that's awesome! Thanks, I guess I missed that post. Really interesting stuff; I'll have to remember to keep an eye on it.
#1.1.1.1 Andy Woodruff (Link) on 2009-06-23 17:31 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
Archie Belaney about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
"If" you get a straight answer, I'll be [...]


Emile Zola about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
Word on the street is ESRI used NGA [...]


Adena Schutzberg about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I've asked that question of ESRI. I'll [...]


MW about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I would be interested in hearing if [...]


Adena Schutzberg about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Thanks Mouse and sorry Tuscany!


Joe Francica about NY State GIS Consultant Promotes Snowmobiling and her Business
November 5
Herkimer, NY! Well known site of the [...]


Anon Y. Mouse about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Sp. on headline - one N


Amazon Recommendations