Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (88)
planetgs.com (78)
www.thegisforum.com (75)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
manomano.livejournal.com (31)
Our Points
Friday, February 27. 2009

Quote of the Week

"These developments are so new they are not on any maps. Not even Google."

- NPR correspondent describing why a real estate buying tour bus got lost trying to find new developments outside Los Angeles. The story will be posted here later this morning.

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in Google at 06:03 | Comments (4) | Trackbacks (0) | Bookmark and Share

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

~Sigh~
Why is it that people think that because it has pictures its new? The data around Nashville, TN is five years old.
#1 Jim (Link) on 2009-02-27 08:21 (Reply)
People are awe-struck by "The Google," that's why.
#1.1 Atanas Entchev (Link) on 2009-02-27 08:45 (Reply)
What leads you to think Nashville's data is 5 years old? Nashville has a web site showing aerial photography no more than 1 year old and parcels and roads are updated constantly.
#1.2 Kim McDonough on 2009-03-02 13:19 (Reply)
The County data is better/most recent. The data on Google Earth is 5 years old.
#1.2.1 Jim on 2009-03-03 07:20 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
Julian Bourne about Podcast: Implications for Twitter's Geolocation API
November 24
Great podcast - good point about time [...]


Jeremy Heffner about Podcast: Implications for Twitter's Geolocation API
November 24
Great topic. I wrote a blog post about [...]


Andrew Turner about Apps.gov Prices for Google API: Nearly $1million
November 23
Make sure and check the terms of these [...]


Briantist about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]


SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]


Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]


Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]


Amazon Recommendations