Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back February '10 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
georezo.net (166)
planetgs.com (63)
www.thegisforum.com (43)
www.bloglines.com (25)
bit.ly (23)
Our Points
Tuesday, February 17. 2009

The U.S. Economic Stimulus Package - What's in it for Geospatial

Geospatial Business


The economic stimulus package signed today into law by President Barack Obama totals $787 Billion. Is there anything in this bill that can be remotely "tagged" as stimulating the geospatial industry? There's been lots of talk about the "trickle down" effect of how infrastructure projects will spur the business of road and building design, site selection, and analysis. But is there anything more specific than that? The Wall Street Journal published a fairly comprehensive list of where spending will be appropriated. So, let's analyze, albeit as an "educated guess," where the spending "might" impact the geospatial technology sector:


I've broken down the list into two categories: Will Impact & Might Impact


Will Impact:
  1. Grants for capital investments in designated high-speed rail corridors - $8B
  2. Grants for highway improvements - $29B
  3. Renovation of forest roads, bridges and trails, remediation of abandoned mines, removal of barriers to fish and other critical habitat - $650M
  4. Repairing facilities and equipment for U.S. Geological Survey seismic, volcano, monitoring and stream gages - $140M
  5. Modernization of the electric grid - $4.4B

Might Impact:
  1. Funding for watershed and flood prevention projects - $290M
  2. Urban industrial core and rural economic recovery programs - $150M
  3. Public transit improvements and infrastructure investments - $8.4B
  4. Grants for airport improvements - $1.1B
  5. Grants for security upgrades to ports - $150M
  6. Repairing and removing bridges hazardous to marine navigation - $142M
  7. Border security fencing and technology - $100M
  8. Funding for Homeland Security departmental site security, IT infrastructure, furniture, fixtures and other costs for headquarters - $200M
  9. Clean-up of 'brownfield' former industrial sites - $100
  10. NASA climate research - $400M
  11. Extra money for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration facilities and research - $230M
  12. Salaries and expenses for program to create broadband inventory map of the country - $350M
  13. Extra money for Census Bureau - $1B


So, there you have it. I'd liked to hear from readers about their interpretation.
Posted by Joe Francica in Geospatial Business at 18:47 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0) | Bookmark and Share

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

No doubt there will be slight trickle down benefits to our geospatial industry. Whether big players like ESRI will get a windfall is doubtful.

However, as any aware person would be I am deeply disturbed by this stimulus plan's big spending spree and other enormous unfunded fiscal binges by the government for bailouts of every stripe.

Besides weighting down present and future generations with massive tax obligations to pay for it all I cringe at the thought of local and state governments acting Soviet style as appendages of the Central Government in accepting forthcoming federal loot with strings attached.
#1 Paul on 2009-02-20 14:32 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your feeling about commercial organizations that participate in kind or cash support to help in disasters and publicize those efforts?
No issues; it's good for the planet and good business.
It's ok, but does make me wonder about their motives.
It's pure marketing, and bothers me.
Have no strong feeling.

Archives
Comments
Adena Schutzberg about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Thanks - those two issue have been [...]


jerry sullivan about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
"WaStershed"

also, the hotlink to [...]


Adena Schutzberg about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Kelly,

Sorry - just bad editing on my [...]


Kevin about Update: NAVTEQ Shutting Down Phone Map App Nav4All that Uses NAVTEQ Data
February 9
Agreed - if a user of OSM data alters, [...]


Kelly McDermott about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Adena,

North Dakota, South Dakota - [...]


Scott about Update: NAVTEQ Shutting Down Phone Map App Nav4All that Uses NAVTEQ Data
February 9
Besides that OSM data is not "perfect or [...]


Chris about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Not to be a buzz kill for South Dakota, [...]


Amazon Recommendations