Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (161)
planetgs.com (106)
www.thegisforum.com (73)
www.bloglines.com (44)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
Our Points
Tuesday, December 2. 2008

Microsoft Eagle 1: R&D Implementation of Integrated Data/ Maps for Emergency Response

CIO Australia highlights Eagle 1, along with other "in development" technologies. This one sounds all too familiar to me after witnessing many OGC interoperability demos.

Eagle 1 pulls information from multiple databases and uses geospatial mapping technology to create an interactive map that would show, for example, all the schools, military bases, hospitals in the affected area. Plus it would show how many people are in the hospitals, current evacuation models and casualties or danger zones, even a plume model that could show where a gas leak is heading.

There's nothing to note what enables access to all those databases, but there's a note that "the process of configuring the data extractions will likely involve a team of Microsoft disaster specialists."

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in Microsoft at 07:13 | Comments (4) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

thankes for the technologey
dr.fakhri
#1 FAKHRI GHONEIM on 2008-12-05 05:12 (Reply)
Not the technology is the succes behind Eagle One, it's the succesfull implementation of this technology in the context of disastermanagment on every level (from the men in the field to the minister). Two worlds have come together: geo-information and disastermanagement.
#2 Jene van der Heide (sr. pm Cadastre NL) (Link) on 2008-12-05 07:26 (Reply)
It may be the successful implementation, but it's also the quality of the uderlying data. Regardless of advances in technology and the implementation of those technologies it is still "garbage in, garbage out". We now have the potential to do even more amazing things with bad data.
#2.1 Michael Sweet on 2008-12-05 09:04 (Reply)
This sounds like a perhaps more proprietary version of the EU INSPIRE initiative - no less interesting for that
#2.1.1 Paul Crisp on 2008-12-08 08:45 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
Archie Belaney about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
"If" you get a straight answer, I'll be [...]


Emile Zola about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
Word on the street is ESRI used NGA [...]


Adena Schutzberg about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I've asked that question of ESRI. I'll [...]


MW about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I would be interested in hearing if [...]


Adena Schutzberg about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Thanks Mouse and sorry Tuscany!


Joe Francica about NY State GIS Consultant Promotes Snowmobiling and her Business
November 5
Herkimer, NY! Well known site of the [...]


Anon Y. Mouse about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Sp. on headline - one N


Amazon Recommendations