Monday, November 10. 2008

Experts: Satellites Not Great in Finding Downed Planes in Rough Terrain

The Press-Enterprise (San Bernardino) has a reality check article highlighting how satellite imagery and other remote sensing tools are just not that helpful in finding survivors (or even wreckage) of downed planes in rough terrain. Recent efforts to find ex-Israeli paratrooper David Katz and Steve Fossett were unsuccessful even with experimental radar and infrared tools. In the end, people in the area found the two crash sites. John Pike of Global Security has the last word:

With Fossett, they mounted a pretty good-sized effort. Most people aren't worth that much money," Pike said. "I would look for the development of more rugged (crash-activated) beacons.

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in Remote Sensing at 06:56 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0) |

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

I am no expert, but I arrived at the same conclusion and wrote about it just over a month ago:

http://blog.entchev.com/2008/10/04/steve-fossets-plane-wreckage-found--by-a-hiker.aspx

In a related (in my mind) story, TIME magazine in its current issue blames the Wall Street meltdown in part to over-reliance on faulty computer models.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1856998-1,00.html

Unrealistic expectations continue to be set to this day by technology vendors who have perfected the art of the presentation, elevating many sales seminars to the status of magic shows for decision-makers.

#1 Atanas Entchev (Link) on 2008-11-10 09:26 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to	[ Top level ]#1: Atanas Entchev on 2008-11-10 09:26
Comment	Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_. Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above:
	Remember Information?   Subscribe to this entry