Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (88)
planetgs.com (77)
www.thegisforum.com (71)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
www.bloglines.com (27)
planetgs.com (77)
www.thegisforum.com (71)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
www.bloglines.com (27)
Our Points
|
Friday, September 12. 2008
|
Changes to Survey of India's Map Publishing Policy
Excerpt from "Across an Unmapped Land" by Ravi Vyas in the Telegraph
There are other ‘geobrowsers’ too [beyond Google Earth] and between them the whole world would be mapped in the minutest detail. It is against this backdrop we have to see the anachronistic requirements for the reproduction of Indian maps in books and periodicals. Under existing copyright laws, any map of India, and this includes historical maps dating back to Vedic times, has to be cleared by the Survey of India, failing which the publication can be confiscated. The Survey of India checks the “authenticity” of external boundaries vis-à-vis Pakistan, China, Bangladesh and the coastal boundaries that includes all the islands on the Bay of Bengal, Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea. This is an expensive and time consuming process.
However, because of repeated requests from publishers to simplify the checking procedures, the survey has made a small change: you can reproduce maps of India if you use outline maps provided by the survey. But these maps cannot be traced or reproduced photographically because the survey thinks that some distortion of boundaries takes place while doing this. If these rules are not followed, then the publisher or distributor has to add a disclaimer stating that the maps does not represent the authentic boundaries of India.
The question that is often asked is whether these regulations are at all necessary with the technological advance in communications and when information is easily available on the internet.
I suppose the change is a step forward, but clearly larger ones are needed.
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
Archives
Archives
Comments
Briantist about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]
SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]
Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]
Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]
Adena Schutzberg about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
You are correct! [...]
Archie Belaney about Update 5: AT&T Sues Verizon over "Map for That" Map Ads
November 19
If you're advertising 3g coverage is [...]
Maitri about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
Hey, I know Yu-Feng! We went to grad [...]
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]
SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]
Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]
Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]
Adena Schutzberg about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
You are correct! [...]
Archie Belaney about Update 5: AT&T Sues Verizon over "Map for That" Map Ads
November 19
If you're advertising 3g coverage is [...]
Maitri about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
Hey, I know Yu-Feng! We went to grad [...]




