Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (161)
planetgs.com (106)
www.thegisforum.com (73)
www.bloglines.com (44)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
planetgs.com (106)
www.thegisforum.com (73)
www.bloglines.com (44)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
Our Points
|
Thursday, August 14. 2008
|
MAPPS Reports Meeting Attendee Members (and their guests) Preferences in U.S. Election: Why?
MAPPS reports (press release) the results of two polls taken at its recent meeting.
Senator John McCain topped Senator Barack Obama by an overwhelming 76% to 24% margin in a poll of MAPPS members conducted July 19-23.
...
McCain was also the choice in a poll of spouses, guest and others attending the MAPPS 2008 summer meeting. In a poll open to all conference attendees, McCain led Obama by a 64% to 36% margin.
The interpretation:
"The MAPPS members clearly prefer Senator McCain based on his record on business issues, taxes, foreign policy and national defense," said MAPPS Executive Director John Palatiello. "The margin in the poll demonstrates that MAPPS members view the 2008 Presidential election as a clear choice."
How does this activity, and the choice to publicly not only share but formally release the results fit with its mission and goals?
MAPPS is the most politically active association in the geospatial community. The association features a full time government relations staff in Washington, DC, sponsors the MAPPS Political Action Committee (MAPPS PAC), and hosts a Federal Programs Conference in March of each year in which members of MAPPS visit Capitol Hill for meetings with some 300 members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.
As a nonprofit, nonpartisan association organized under section 501(c)(6) of the Interal Revenue Code, MAPPS does not endorse any candidate or party. The poll was taken for informational purposes only and does not constitute an endorsement nor an attempt to influence any members, voters or elections.
Per the release, MAPPS took a similar vote in 2004, where members picked Bush. I'm sure this is all on the up and up legally. Is it valuable to members to take and publish results of such polls? Is it valuable to those reading the PR? Is it just a fun way to get MAPPS in the news? (Nothing wrong with that!) Do other professional or industry groups take such polls and publish results?
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
Archives
Archives
Comments
Archie Belaney about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
"If" you get a straight answer, I'll be [...]
Emile Zola about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
Word on the street is ESRI used NGA [...]
Adena Schutzberg about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I've asked that question of ESRI. I'll [...]
MW about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I would be interested in hearing if [...]
Adena Schutzberg about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Thanks Mouse and sorry Tuscany!
Joe Francica about NY State GIS Consultant Promotes Snowmobiling and her Business
November 5
Herkimer, NY! Well known site of the [...]
Anon Y. Mouse about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Sp. on headline - one N
November 6
"If" you get a straight answer, I'll be [...]
Emile Zola about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
Word on the street is ESRI used NGA [...]
Adena Schutzberg about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I've asked that question of ESRI. I'll [...]
MW about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I would be interested in hearing if [...]
Adena Schutzberg about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Thanks Mouse and sorry Tuscany!
Joe Francica about NY State GIS Consultant Promotes Snowmobiling and her Business
November 5
Herkimer, NY! Well known site of the [...]
Anon Y. Mouse about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Sp. on headline - one N




