Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (88)
planetgs.com (77)
www.thegisforum.com (71)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
www.bloglines.com (27)
Our Points
Thursday, July 17. 2008

Arrington: Facebook, MySpace Blow it on iPhone without Location

LBS

Michael Arrington at TechCruch (via Washington Post) chastises the two social networks because while they offer effective and popular apps for the iPhone, neither added in location, something he says is the only way to draw new users.

But while both applications are useful for heavy users, they won't drive new users to the services because they failed to leverage the killer iPhone feature - location awareness.

He acknowledges privacy concerns, but seems convinced these can be managed. It does seem these and other players are simply "late to the party" giving Loopt, Whrrl and others a jump on the mobile platform.

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in LBS, Apple at 08:40 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0) | Bookmark and Share

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Okay, enlighten me fancy pants. I have accounts on both network sites -- and looking at Apple's usage analytics -- how exactly do these networking sites either benefit or find it less value-added at this time to not include location?

I suppose you'd have to actually use these sites to come to the understanding that the majority of its user-base could really care less to use location for their profiles, and in fact would totally not wish to use location in relation to their profiles.

This criticism is perhaps the dumbest thing I've read in some time. Yet, considering it's here, at All Points -- that totally does not surprise me in the least!
#1 Daniel (Link) on 2008-07-20 17:46 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
Briantist about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]


SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]


Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]


Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]


Adena Schutzberg about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
You are correct! [...]


Archie Belaney about Update 5: AT&T Sues Verizon over "Map for That" Map Ads
November 19
If you're advertising 3g coverage is [...]


Maitri about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
Hey, I know Yu-Feng! We went to grad [...]


Amazon Recommendations