Update 7/2/08: See
comment below from PS Editor Tom Gibson for the further details.
---- Original post 6/30/08 -------
Back when I read more print magazines, I always relished the editorials. Wow, I thought, a whole page for the editor to tell you what was on his or her mind. My favorite editorial writers back then where Roopinder Tara at Cadence (who I wrote for at that publication, then worked for at Tenlinks.com) and the then editor of Backpacker, I don't recall his name. Today I still make it a point to read the editorials in print publication in geospatial and related industries.
It's in one of those, Tom Gibson's "editor's desk" (sic) column in
Professional Surveyor (July 2008, page 4, not online yet) that I found this statement:
In assembling this issue, we had one company withdraw a feature story because a state licensing board was concerned it depicted GIS practitioners as doing work surveyors should be doing, saying they should be licensed as surveyors to do it.
That prompted a few responses from me:
(1) I wonder how the state licensing board had a chance to read the article.
(2) Does preventing such articles to be published limit instead of encouraging discussion on the matter?
(3) Should Directions Media (and other geopublishers formal and informal) be prepared to deal with this issue? Will we be receiving "take down" notices regarding articles that include descriptions of such work in alleged violation of state laws?
Disclosure: I used to work for the company that publishes Professional Surveyor.
Most surveyors I know are great people and quite necessary in our society. There does seem to be a small vocal group who are operating with the fear/intimidation model of a self-determined closed society. Ask VERY specific questions of your state boards when the topic comes up. Questions specific to the use of GIS in the local engineering firms. You will, more than likely, find that they do not have the answers.
The issue of GIS licensure under surveying will continue to drain professional effort in the pursuit of a moot point. The technology is already in the hands of guru geeks (not even geographers/GIS professionals) and citizens (Where 2.0 for example). Lets exploit the benefits without throwing up walls!
Perhaps you know more than I do regarding this matter. You noted: "I am very disappointed in any publication that would preview an article to a government agency and censor the content."
Mr. Gibson didn't explain how this all happened. Are you speaking here from specific knowledge about the publication previewing the article to a government agency? Further, Mr. Gibson didn't say the magazine chose not to publish the article, he said a company "withdrew" it.
My title about censoring referred to the pressure on "the company" that caused it to effectively "self-censor."
I invite Mr. Gibson, if appropriate, to provide further details. I don't think he'll be the last person to deal with this.
A few thoughts:
State Licensing Boards only have authority over those that they license. While a licensing board might be able to pressure licensed surveyors to not participate in the writing of an article (and even that is debatable) they have no authority over publications.
My experience has been that technological advances have tended to render most regulatory efforts of state licensing boards irrelevant. For example; here in Texas, the board recently voted to adopt a rule that it was okay for a surveyor to furnish a legal description in Microsoft Word format. Welcome to the 20th century. Maybe in a couple of years the board will decide to allow us to email CAD drawings as well.
Yes, there is a very small group of very vocal surveyors that seek to use the powers government to insure their own incomes. You will find groups like that in any licensed profession, lawyers being the worst. Ignore them. There are plenty of surveyors that are quite comfortable moving between the dual disciplines of GIS and Land Surveying.
The number of surveyors involved in GIS is growing everyday. It is rare to meet a young surveyor that isn't trained and competent in both GIS and surveying. Older surveyors are catching on as well. The state surveyor's society held a weekend of seminars back in February. One of the most popular sessions was using GIS in your surveying business.
In this case, however, it looks like the author and/or folks he was working with reached out to the licensing board for vetting and review of the article prior to publication, and may have received some concern back from the board and made their own decision to withdraw.
To set the record straight, we had no part in getting that story reviewed by a licensing board or pulling it from the July issue. In this instance, we worked through a company in the industry who assisted us in soliciting the story, but we never received this story. For the record, we would not ourselves ask a government agency to review an article to gain their approval, as we strive for fair and balanced journalism.
While we take no sides in the discussion about the licensure of surveyors and GIS professionals, we are glad to join in the discourse, so both sides can ultimately resolve these issues to everyone’s benefit. Fittingly, the topic will be covered in a panel discussion coming up as part of the Survey Summit at the ESRI User Conference in San Diego in early August.
Tom Gibson, PE
Editor
Professional Surveyor Magazine
Typically, cadastral work, identifying property boundaries based on interpretation of evidence, jurisdictional boundaries and things of that nature fall under the purview of land surveying. Beyond that, other activities may or may not considered land surveying - it varies by state.
Speaking as a surveyor, the area that concerns me the most is tax mapping offices, which have on occasion overstepped their bounds, making or participating in determinations based on property boundary (such as zoning issues), preparing descriptions, and other activities, based on GIS data and/or photointerpolation of fencelines and other sorts of activities.