Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (161)
planetgs.com (106)
www.thegisforum.com (73)
www.bloglines.com (44)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
Our Points
Tuesday, October 30. 2007

GCN Covers MS "Joining" OGC

The article highlights the importance of the company joining OGC, but does not mention Microsoft was a member in the past. That makes this comment give me pause.

OGC Chairman and chief executive officer David Schell told GCN that Microsoft’s decision to join OGC represents a major change in the industry. In its early years, OGC was supported primarily by developers of geospatial tools for vertical markets, such as ESRI and Autodesk. The recent addition of Google and now Microsoft represents a sea change, according to Schell.

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in Microsoft at 08:40 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Maybe "sea change" includes "ebb and flow", in which case Microsoft's return to OGC is covered by the term. The previous Microsoft membership was initially due to their interest in Intelligent Transportation Systems and ISO TC204, then later due to the involvement of the TerraServer group who were rolling out WMS access. This new Microsoft group seems to be a combination of the GeoTango/Virtual Earth/Database groups so in a sense it's a new approach for Microsoft.

Regarding the quote about Microsoft's ubiquitous presence, it seems to me that Google's presence is even more ubiquitous. However, in terms of perception by "big government", particularly in the US, having Microsoft as a member is a big deal.

It remains to be seen how "stabilizing" this winds up being. Microsoft would not join just to stabilize things, particularly KML. I suspect they have some specs of their own they want to toss into the mix.
#1 Allan Doyle on 2007-10-30 10:56 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
Archie Belaney about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
"If" you get a straight answer, I'll be [...]


Emile Zola about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
Word on the street is ESRI used NGA [...]


Adena Schutzberg about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I've asked that question of ESRI. I'll [...]


MW about ESRI Keywords: Authoritative Data, Generic Services
November 6
I would be interested in hearing if [...]


Adena Schutzberg about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Thanks Mouse and sorry Tuscany!


Joe Francica about NY State GIS Consultant Promotes Snowmobiling and her Business
November 5
Herkimer, NY! Well known site of the [...]


Anon Y. Mouse about Tuscany's Open Source GIS Evolves
November 5
Sp. on headline - one N


Amazon Recommendations