Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (85)
planetgs.com (75)
www.thegisforum.com (70)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
www.bloglines.com (27)
Our Points
Friday, September 7. 2007

Why the NYC Taxi Strike is Not About GPS

GPS

I won't take credit for this, David Alexander at Telematics Journal tells it. It's about money (no kidding!)

Bottom line: Cabbies have to pay for the system and arguing they'll lose money since credit card payments shave a bit off each fare. He notes that a slightly different business model (advertising will pay for the system in no time) would have changed the result significantly. Moreover, he notes, cabbies already have to submit trip reports on paper. The new system automates that.

As he concludes:


Privacy and the “Fear of GPS” is a red herring. It makes for a more dramatic story than “Cabbies Shortchanged by Big Business,” but GPS is not at fault here, and this is a non-story from the GPS perspective.

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in GPS at 06:27 | Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0) | Bookmark and Share

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Not sure I agree. I live here in NYC and rode cabs throughout the two day strike. I spoke with each driver trying to understand their take on the situation. Of the 5 or 6 I spoke with, only one mentioned the additional expense that drivers would incur.

The overriding concern seems to be a fear of privacy and monitoring by the TLC. I heard reasons that seemed wacky (they will be monitoring real-time how fast drivers are going and ticket them) to ones that seamed legitimate (TLC having real time knowledge of where and when a fare is picked up). I don't believe that cabbies have to submit a trip report- though they must keep one. The report is maintained by the driver for their records and is only reviewed when a customer complains.

In short, there is quite a bit of disinformation that has reached drivers and their seems to be real confusion about what GPS will bring. While cost is an issue, the big problem seems to be that drivers don't see how this will benefit them. If the TLC had provided a means for the drivers to make more money from the GPS- my feeling is that it would not have run into such resistance.
#1 AP on 2007-09-08 19:34 (Reply)
what's all the fuss? if you're the company owner don't you have the authority to monitor your workforce and assets? If you're the worker/cab driver, don't you want to let your boss know where you are in case you got rob, murder, etc...? has it become legal for law enforcement to issue a ticket base on electronic instrument recordings? I really think this is more about controls--drivers don't want to be known where they are, company want to be able to track their assets (vehicles). Realistic, GPS should help the industry because it would allow the drivers to analyze their routes and which makes them the most profit and company can direct drivers to profit center--which the existing method does not allowed because a lazy driver would just said he/she is not near that location. GPS should help to optimise this mode of transportation. So someone please provide a good explanation of this issue from the driver's POV......thanks
#2 XOX on 2007-10-01 22:17 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
folsäure about Oregon Data Portal Opens
November 22
This functionality builds on the huge [...]


Briantist about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]


SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]


Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]


Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]


Adena Schutzberg about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
You are correct! [...]


Archie Belaney about Update 5: AT&T Sues Verizon over "Map for That" Map Ads
November 19
If you're advertising 3g coverage is [...]


Amazon Recommendations