Wednesday, August 22. 2007

URISA: Themes

After a day of sessions and talks in the halls, I'll offer up three themes from URISA 2007:

1) Reclamation of geospatial - There's a sense URISA (and frankly the broader geospatial community) feel a need to grab onto and hold tight the idea of a geospatial discipline. Several topics covered formally and informally support my assertion I think: the work on/discussion of/and use of the Body of Knowledge (let's define what we do), the URISA Leadership Academy (let's better eduate our leaders to promote and lead the way forward, not necessarily from a tech, but a management perspective), certification (let's acknowledge to the world "what we know"), concern about others moving into our space (surveyors in particular - though I saw none present), the historical look at the 1967 New Haven Census Use Study (let's define, document our past to help define our present and future).

2) URISA is not technical - At one time I think the conference was more focussed on technology. When I was at ESRI I considered URISA as "User Conference Part 2" since we retold and redemoed the same material for a new audience. That's not really happening; the ESRI user group meeting included a very short recap of some User Conference themes but was really about networking. No vendor I spoke with had a technology announcement. Several conversations in the halls helped me confirm the URISA is redefining itself around policy and more management/leadership education. That focus may be part of the reason numbers are dropping off. Fewer people in our industry need those types of skills compared with the relatively large number who need to use, program and interact with software day to day. Those people, I think, are spending their conference dollars on technical conferences, that is, vendor conferences.

3) Government is conservative and thus so is URISA. The topics of the conference are not cutting edge: the lack of mention of GAMY and the lack of presense is one indication. The topics of concern I listed from the first plenary are not new (we've certianly not solved them, but they are not cutting edge new problems). URISA members need to see and want to be involved in longterm change and that's a good role for them. The downside: I saw far more gray hair in the sessions and few upstart young people.

[Disclosure: URISA covered my lodging for this event.]

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in URISA 07 at 10:13 | Comments (3) | Trackbacks (0) |

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

I am revealing how little I follow blogs, but I didn't recognize "GAMY" so I searched for a definition. What I found was "GAMEY: Google, AOL, Microsoft, eBay, and Yahoo!" in Wikipedia. I guess eBay may not be a big player in our arena, hence "GAMY."

#1 Charles Dingman on 2007-08-23 10:30 (Reply)

Charles,

Yes, that's right and my appologies for not writing it out. Actually, in the list of discussion topics at URISA it was noted as "MAGY" so I guess you have some choice as to the acronym you prefer.

Adena

#2 Adena Schutzberg (Link) on 2007-08-23 13:38 (Reply)

Adena,

I always enjoy your posts from the various conferences and had looked forward to this URISA as I was not able to attend. Reading Point 1) I regretted not attending, particularly since it does not appear that there was a Surveyor present to take up the point of who is encroaching on whose professional space. Here in New Jersey Licensed Surveyors are the profession spoken of in the law as the experts in measurement and establishment of features on the face of the earth. The survey community in NJ has attempted to establish a cooperative environment and an ongoing dialogue with the GIS community through collaboration at the state and national level through the New Jersey Soc of Prof Land Surveyors, (NJSPLS) and NSPS/ACSM. Rather than taking a view, offered my many, that GIS folks are engaged in the unlicensed practice of surveying we are preferring to work together. to better serve the public. Since at the best GIS may be 50 years old and Surveyors and cartographers were making many of the products now produced using GIS technologies It is reasonable to ask if the GIS folks represented by URISA and others are not in fact the interlopers.

BTW I am proud to be both a PLS and a GISP

Keep up the good reporting and enticing comment.

Russ

#3 Russell S. Kauffman PLS, GISP (Link) on 2007-08-24 17:36 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to	[ Top level ]#1: Charles Dingman on 2007-08-23 10:30 #2: Adena Schutzberg on 2007-08-23 13:38 #3: Russell S. Kauffman PLS, GISP on 2007-08-24 17:36
Comment	Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_. Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above:
	Remember Information?   Subscribe to this entry