Wednesday, August 22. 2007

URISA: Tidbits

Here are a bunch little notes from URISA:

- I sat at the "ethics" table for the round table discussions. There were four of us, all women. And, to a one they'd withheld from doing certain things based on the ethics requirements of their positions in government or as AICPs (certified planners). One didn't attend a fancy event at a conference, a second did not enter the "treasure hunt" in the URISA exhibit hall, the third turned down a dinner certificate. I for one am jazzed to see folks who clearly don't make tons of money taking these "limitations" seriously.

- The URISA Leadership Academy will launch in December; it's aimed at providing leadership training specifically geared to GIS people. It's a five part program and they are looking for instructors. The discussion of it during the Tuesday plenary made me smile since many of the topics are ones we included in the Penn State Masters in GIS.

- Some numbers: there were some 560 people registered before the conference and about 20 more who registered on site. I was disappointed the plenaries had nowhere near that number of attendees. I learned that nominations for the National Geospatial Advisory Committee totalled more than 100.

- An open source workshop was "well attended," per the instructor, Sara Yurman. When I mentioned to her my concern at the lack of open source buzz at URISA she noted that there's more buzz now than in the past. I understand one commercial vendor sat in the workshop.

[Disclosure: URISA covered my lodging for this event.]

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in URISA 07 at 10:00 | Comments (3) | Trackbacks (0) |

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Any rumors as to when the National Geospatial Advisory Committee members would be announced? Yeah, I applied as well!

#1 Anonymous on 2007-08-22 12:38 (Reply)

Actually, it may be a while; there's a bunch of vetting that must happen as these are federal advisors.

Adena

#2 Adena Schutzberg (Link) on 2007-08-22 13:21 (Reply)

On ethics, or "ethics," as you quite appropriately put it. In ours, and in other professions (I am an AICP), there seems to be a dearth of meaningful guidelines as to what "gifts" are acceptable and what not. An example: At a big annual industry show (New Jersey League of Municipalities in Atlantic City), which is known as "adult trick-or-treating" among vendors, a municipal business administrator refused to accept A PEN, citing ethics guidelines. Clearly over the top, IMHO.

#3 Atanas Entchev (Link) on 2007-08-22 13:44 (Reply)

Add Comment

Name
Email
Homepage
In reply to	[ Top level ]#1: Anonymous on 2007-08-22 12:38 #2: Adena Schutzberg on 2007-08-22 13:21 #3: Atanas Entchev on 2007-08-22 13:44
Comment	Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_. Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above:
	Remember Information?   Subscribe to this entry