Close

Close
Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Back November '09 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Syndicate This Blog
Top Referers
myteams.dot.ga.gov (88)
planetgs.com (75)
www.thegisforum.com (72)
www.spatialsciences.org.au (32)
manomano.livejournal.com (28)
Our Points
Wednesday, May 30. 2007

Microsoft's Touch Table

I guess I'm jaded having seen the Northrop Grumman "touch table" a few times. Yesterday Microsoft announced its own version at the Wall Street Journal’s D: All Things Digital conference. It's called Microsoft Surface. And per the PR it's "the first in a new category of surface computing products from Microsoft that breaks down traditional barriers between people and technology. Surface turns an ordinary tabletop into a vibrant, dynamic surface that provides effortless interaction with all forms of digital content through natural gestures, touch and physical objects."

It should be out in public by year's end. One plus: it should be cheaper, right?

- Mercury News Blog

Posted by Adena Schutzberg in Microsoft at 06:55 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0) | Bookmark and Share

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

It continues to baffle me why it is that Microsoft takes the approach of bypassing end-user usability on a mass scale - by going into a development that's already been implemented by several others with Google Earth, before integrating usability on a mass scale. Is this just another sign of weakness for Microsoft's ability to compete, I wonder?

Take a look at CASA's implementation of table or even desk-top viewing at their site. This stuff has been done, and done extremely well in Google Earth.

And no offense, Adena - but you often seem to report exclusively on Microsoft. Why is this? I'm just curious. I rarely see an adequate comparison to technologies that compete with what you're reporting.
#1 Daniel (Link) on 2007-05-30 11:04 (Reply)

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA
    
  
 
Advertisers
Polls
What's your opinion of the quality of Google's "new" U.S. dataset?
I haven't noticed a difference.
It's better.
it's not as good.
I don't use Google Maps regularly.

Archives
Comments
Andrew Turner about Apps.gov Prices for Google API: Nearly $1million
November 23
Make sure and check the terms of these [...]


Briantist about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 21
Perhaps there should be an on-screen [...]


SMR about Seen During Geography Awareness Week IV
November 20
This is very funny. Google Earth has [...]


Claudio Schapsis about Twitter Geo API Available
November 20
Location on Twitter is not new. There [...]


Kirk Kuykendall about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
It's also worth watching Wolfram Alpha. [...]


Adena Schutzberg about Why I got an e-mail from Wolfram Research
November 19
You are correct! [...]


Archie Belaney about Update 5: AT&T Sues Verizon over "Map for That" Map Ads
November 19
If you're advertising 3g coverage is [...]


Amazon Recommendations