All Points Blog
Our Opinion, Your Views of All Things Location

  • HOME

    About Us

    Advertising

    Contact Us

    Follow Us



    Feed  Twitter 

  • RECENT COMMENTS
  • NEWSLETTER

    All Points Blog

    Catching geospatial news that others miss. Delivered daily.

    Preview Newsletter | Archive

  • ARCHIVE
    << July 2010 >>
    S M T W T F S
            1 2 3
    4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    11 12 13 14 15 16 17
    18 19 20 21 22 23 24
    25 26 27 28 29 30 31
  • PUBLICATIONS

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Alas, I could only stay for a short time, but the once titled Geospatial Line of Business (GLOB) - Life Cycle Management session became a combined one about Geoplatform.gov and the GLOB.

Tony Lavoie, of NOAA is taking the lead on this effort which comes out of the President’s 2010 budget. (See my coverage in Directions Magazine). He asked why people were here and the two responses were quite telling.

John Paletiello (of MAPPS) said: We want to know the difference between this and GLOB, Geospatial-One Stop, a National Spatial Infrastructure? Where is the data coming from? Is this a place for Imagery for the Nation and Elevation for the Nation?

A senior person from the Bureau of Land Management (2000 federal GIS users) said: Is there anything in this for us? Is there data that will be helpful for us to do our jobs?

Lavoie started by noting he was asked to get involved in March. He wondered, “Is this for real?” Karen Siderlis, per his telling, replied, “There is the possibility of making it real.” With that, Lavoie said, he was “willing to give it one more shot.” That’s not the ringing endorsement I would have hoped for, but appreciate the candor in this story.

Lavoie then explained the process of looking at what the federal government “had,” what it had learned from previous efforts (Hank Garie, who led Geospatial One-Stop is involved as a consultant) and putting together the draft overview document (actully the 3rd draft) that was due the 1st of July. He then went on to review that document. I left after Lavoie shared a definition of the platform that attendees began to question. It went something like this:

The geoplatform is a set of data, services and apps hosted by the federal government for the use of government agencies and partners to support their missions and those of the nation.

Among the questions as I packed up: Should there be a reference to “equity” in there? Whose mission? The lowly GIS user or the administrator of an agency? Where will the needed “good” data come from? Next up, was someone who’s name I didn’t catch who works at USDA, who was discuss governance.

All I know now is that a fourth draft is expected and I hope the public at large will be able to look at this document and comment. I’m not sure when that will be possible. For now, I know NGAC, which meets on Thursday at ESRI UC [8:30 am, rm 28D) is considering the document.

by Adena Schutzberg on 07/14 at 04:12 PM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

Tuesday at 8:30 am far more people than I expected filled the first of two sessions on ESRI’s Community Basemap Program. Let’s start with the Q & A from that session, then go to questions I and readers had after our podcast on this topic.

Recall that ESRI is building a series of basemaps from community and commercial provider to be published as services for use in ESRI products, APIs and via ArcGIS Online.

These are questions (from the audience) and answers from Dean Kensock and Christophe Charpentier at the end of the presentation (both paraphrased).

Q: Might data contributed for one basemap (streets) be used in another (imagery)?
A: Yes, but we’d ask you if was ok, first.

Q: What about other layers (beyond, topo, imagery, streets)?
A: We are looking for feedback on that, but for now are focussing on these base layers. Among those suggested: parcels, historic imagery, imagery labels, trails.

Q: What about correcting errors in the data?
A: Easy ones are easy (like if a road goes off into the ocean). Others we’d need to go back to the provider. We do hope to one day include VGI to identify errors and corrections.

Q: What is commercial use? (The data is for non-commercial use only.)
A: If it’s not public facing, if it has ads, requires payment to see or supports indirect commercial activity (bringing people to your store, for example). Remember that you can make and share layer packages of your data on ArcGIS.com to share such things now.

Q: Printing?
A: 96 DPI for all the different scales, so there is some pixelation. Best to print them a bit smaller than true size.

Q: How do you deal with boundary issues, that is when two data sources conflict at or near a boundary?
A: We try hard to gain agreement on a boundary, then insure that no data from one source overwrites that of another.

Q: Will ESRI sign required contracts from public data providers?
A: Yes, but legal does not like it! One provider in Spain required that and ESRI complied.

Q: Can you make the agreement public (on the Web)?
A: Yeah, that’s a good idea? (My suggestion!)

Q: Can you use this for geocoding?
A: No, it’s just for display (it’s a tile cache at many different scales), but ESRI offers geocoding and routing services if you need them.

I sat down with with Product Manager Christophe Charpentier to tackle many other questions.

Q: What’s in the license contributors sign?
A: Basically, it says we can serve the data.

Q: Under what license do users provide ESRI the data?
A: We recommend Creative Commons, but are happy to use “their license” or any legal doc that explains their sharing practices. Basically, though, we are fine with any one that allows us to publish the data via Creative Commons.

Q: What about metadata and attribute? How is that handled?
A: Both are accessible in a list via ArcGIS.com and via the REST API for developers. They are by the “footprint” of the data contribution.

Q: How is the data served?
A: ArcGIS Image Service in tiles that match Googles and Bings. That’s now the de facto tiling scheme and ESRI supports it.

Q: Any other service options? Open standard ones like WMS perhaps under consideration?
A: Yes! Some governments are wary to provide data to us to publish via our service since it could be conceived as giving ESRI an advantage. They want other options, like WMS. In other cases, providers want WMS to serve the many platforms within their user base. Some are resolving this issue for the short time by republishing our ESRI service via their ArcGIS Server instance as WMS. [I think that’s called service chaining or a cascading service if I remember my OGC stuff correctly.]

Q: How many orgs are in the program now?
A: About 500 - worldwide! Most are ArcGIS Server users.

Q: Why do you think most are ArcGIS Server users? I’d think they’d NOT have ArcGIS Server, but need their data hosted.
A: Two reasons:
1) Orgs want to use their server to support specific apps for their users, not for publishing to the general public. This takes the burden off their server.
2) Putting their data onto our server in our standard form with neighboring data allows them to easily publish regional apps. They can even keep their local data in its own special data model, while publishing it via a basemap using our standard data model.

Q: Who are these basemaps for?
A: Our users are the first target users, but all GIS users can tap into it.

Q: Can others, say an Intergraph using city, contribute?
A: Absolutely.

Q: How many tiles are served per day?
A: 8 million

Q: How are updates handled?
A: The topo data is updated monthly and streets and imagery less often, about twice a year. The twice a year noted on the website referred to the release cycle of ArcGIS.com. We need to make that more clear.

Q: What’s the future of updating?
A: We want to open tagging of “errors” to everyone but give data owners the power to make edits directly via ArcGIS.com or by uploading data.

Q: What about making vectors available?
A: Right now serving up image tiles is a good “comfort level” for contributors. But in time, that may change.

by Adena Schutzberg on 07/14 at 03:39 PM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

Google wants you to know about this new set of grants. I think there is lots of potential use of Google geospatial tools in the humanities. I note the one grant that obviously uses them below the quote.

Google Awards Nearly $1 Million to Support Digital Humanities Research

Digitization has altered the ways in which printed materials can be searched, analyzed and interpreted. Scholars can now use quantitative techniques to analyze large amounts of literature and identify trends over selected periods of time, by language, by geography and by topic.  Just years ago, this wasn’t possible. 

To help support digital humanities research, Google is making available nearly $1 million in Google Digital Humanities Awards over the next two years.  These awards will fund 12 research projects that touch on various fields within the humanities, such as Linguistics, Literature, Philosophy, Sociology, Archaeology and Anthropology.  The projects help answer questions such as the following: Can we better characterize Victorian society by quantifying shifts in vocabulary—not just of a few leading writers, but of every book written during the era?  Or can we see and compare every version of the opening line of a work like Virgil’s Aeneid, analyze every place where the line is cited, and examine every instance where it is quoted?

The Digital Humanities Awards are the result of a call for proposals Google issued in April to universities and academic institutions, In total, these 12 projects will receive $479,000 in the first year, with the possibility of renewal next year.  In addition to financial support, the recipients will also be able to access Google data, tools, technologies and expertise.

Quick look reveals at least one using geotools:

Elton Barker, The Open University, Eric C. Kansa, University of California-Berkeley, Leif Isaksen, University of Southampton, United Kingdom. Google Ancient Places (GAP): Discovering historic geographical entities in the Google Books corpus.

- Google Blog

by Adena Schutzberg on 07/14 at 08:07 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

consider what happened in British Columbia. At first Google gave the province free Pro licenses. But after a year, they expired and the government (Environment Ministry) had to shell out a few thousand dollars. In addition, the city spent the money to put the data into KML for Google. A critic notes:

“The province’s extensive image mapping database has real value to a company like Google. But instead of getting a good deal for taxpayers, this looks like another B.C. Liberal giveaway,” said NDP environment critic Rob Fleming.

- Vancouver Sun via Ogle Earth

by Adena Schutzberg on 07/14 at 06:00 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share
Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

All Points Blog Newsletter

Catching geospatial news that others miss. Delivered daily.

Preview Newsletter | Archive

Follow

Feed  Twitter 

Recent Comments

Publications: Directions Magazine | Directions Magazine Francais | Directions Magazine Espanol
Conferences: Location Intelligence Conference | Rocket City Geospatial
© 2012 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved
194 Green Bay Road, Glencoe, IL 60022