All Points Blog
Our Opinion, Your Views of All Things Location

  • HOME

    About Us

    Advertising

    Contact Us

    Follow Us



    Feed  Twitter 

  • RECENT COMMENTS
  • NEWSLETTER

    All Points Blog

    Catching geospatial news that others miss. Delivered daily.

    Preview Newsletter | Archive

  • ARCHIVE
    << March 2010 >>
    S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4 5 6
    7 8 9 10 11 12 13
    14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    28 29 30 31      
  • PUBLICATIONS

Monday, March 08, 2010

Marc Caplan from Homeland Security (a new hire, just four months with the department) offered an overview of the vision for and progress toward Virtual USA (pdf).

Caplan suggested that Virtual USA is a response to today’s challenges: the need for real-time actionable information that’s trapped in silos and not getting to those who need it. There’s no silver bullet - it’s 10% tech, 90% relationships that will make it happen. This could be NSDI, per Bill Burgess, in his introduction.

Currently DHS’s Command, Control and Interoperability (CCI) division is funding several pilots in the Southeast (VIPER, Virtual Alabama) and Pacific Northwest. CCI is learning from these efforts. Capstone proof of concept of ROPP Phase 1 (discussed in this PDF) included eight states sharing data. CCI has seen interest in pilots from New England Area and Fusion Centers (though it intends to focus on response before intelligence uses). There’s also interest in integrating of social media to mix of data. Also in the works: a potential transition to an operational agency for a nationwide implementation since CCI is a research organziation.

Q&A (paraphrased)

Q: Who do you connect with in the states?
A: Varies - but eventually got to Cy Smith (Oregon’s state coordinator). For now its mostly folks going to CCI, not the other way around.

Q: How do we overcome standards already in place in pilots, etc.?
A: Trying to offer some cross fertilization between pilots. Looking to use open standards, but we do need to look at this as/when we transition to operational.

Q: Lots of EMS apps use KML. But KML has limited analysis capabilities…so this creates a database management issue and degrades capabilities of GIS systems.
A: That came out in a pilot in the South East. We don’t tell the pilot projects what tech to use, but share lessons learned. CCI is looking to create converters for KML and GeoRSS (to what, I’m not sure.)

Cy Smith then spoke on the Pacific Northwest Pilot. First challenge was getting the governments working together and setting up a common operating picture aimed at a demo in September focusing on severe weather scenario. Challenges: large region includes Alaska, dispersed population, different standards, tech, need for resources and sustainability. The aim it gear the app toward Flood, fire, winter storm, tsunami, and earthquake response.

Lessons the Pacific Northwest team learned from the Southeast Pilot:

- Technical capability is very different from making it operational.
- Build for the practitioners, something they can use day to day.


Q: Connection to local government?
A: We are trying to figure that out. In PNW - we include local government folks (EOC, first responders, local GIS managers) for an 80/20 local/stat and federal ratio.

Q: Security?
A: Yes it’s an issue. First we looked to data provider to insure security, but we are working on developing security solutions.

Q: What is DHS doing to try to knit existing resources together? What data layers it can provide?
A: We are looking at what we can provide - are talking to FEMA, Unified Incident Command and Decision Support (UICDS)

Q: How does Virtual USA link to HIFELD and other related existing DHS programs.
A: Work in progress. That data should be able to be included in Virtual USA apps.

Q: Are things like info on food and water in there?
A: Could be, based on requirements of pilots.

Q: What can NSGIC do to help you? A regular dialog?
A: Just this conversation is a start; we need to figure how to keep it going.

by Adena Schutzberg on 03/08 at 12:15 PM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

Bill Burgess opened a session on the state of the various NSGIC “for the nation” efforts: Imagery (ITFN), Lidar (EFTN) and Transportation (TFTN).

He started by noting the efforts have “not the revolutionary charge we hoped for.” What we’ve learned: Multi-agency efforts are destined to failure without high level support. In future, perhaps a single agency should take the lead.

Imagery was first for the Nation was begun six years ago, suggested by Ted Koch (WI). The economy “got in the way.” Project Summary Phase 1 report has been “around” and edited, will be released to NGAC and public and serve as basis for Phase 2 (business case). NAIP (1 M) and High Res (Clear30 will make a commodity of this, so perhaps that’s an option) are the two parts. Congressional Hearing on USDA IT this Wednesday. Will Craig will be testifying speaking for IFTN.

Greg Snyder, USGS made the case for Elevation for the Nation (LiDAR) describing it as enhanced elevation data arguing businesses need it, that it’s more than bare earth. He also noted that the “data is ahead of the applications” based on what he saw at The International LIDAR Mapping Forum. Current status: Working on the 2010 National Enhanced Elevation Study - requirements, cost effectiveness, implementation alternatives. That’ll take a year. “We are in the concept stage.”

Steve Lewis, GIO USDOT introduced TFTN, along with reps from the two contractors selected. Everything that could go wrong did go wrong, he began…but the contract was signed for development of strategic plan Feb 2 (one year, four workshops, report). The two contractors are Koniag (Alaska Native Corporation) and Applied Geographics (of Boston). Some challenges noted: TFTN is a concept, not a program - we need to define it as a program. It’s very different from IFTN. How might we use VGI? Role of DOT?

Q: Multimodal data please (Barry from DC)
A: Yes, said Lewis but roads first, even though they are “the most difficult.”

by Adena Schutzberg on 03/08 at 10:19 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

Beth Blauer, Director StatStat Office gave an overview of the now well-documented, well-discussed, well-demoed app from Maryland.

Some key quotes (as best I could get them):

“When hired I didn’t know what GIS is.” (She’s a lawyer by training.)

“Data leads the discussion.”

“Shine a light on the data.”

“Impacts [of decisions] are known and discussed.”

Governor wanted to “not just throw the data on the map but include analytics” such as heatmaps. These analytics (most to me were cartographic rather than analytic) resulted in new busses for Garrett County (low rate of car owners), and targeting housing resources by looking at housing change data (e.g., foreclosure mapping).

“Updated nearly everyday.”

“Why aren’t you mapping your entire budget.” asked Computerworld reporter. The governor wanted that, too. But it’s harder to map that “moving target” (which is required to be balanced in Maryland). Thus StatStat is mapping the capital budget (major infrastructure investments).

BayStat is the oldest app, likely updated soon. It includes GreenPrint, a map of ecological lands throughout the state. Coming: HistoryPrint to manage historical sites for tourism, and enhanced use of a dataset combining criminal justice data.

Q & A (paraphrased)

Q: How are you combing/standardizing data?
A: We have an informal back end, so data all comes in via Excel spreadsheets which are converted into XML, into a basic database. We need to overhaul it. It works. I found this very funny since I’m sitting behind the team from Safe!

Q: Is there dedicated funding?
A: We are patching this together. Constituents trust the data since it’s not showing the governor’s agenda.

by Adena Schutzberg on 03/08 at 09:49 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

The release is everywhere - but I could not find it on the White House Site. Here it is on a Chicago Sun Times Blog. Tufte, among others it says, are intended appointees to the Recovery Independent Advisory Panel. The duty of the panel: “The Panel shall make recommendations to the Board on actions the Board could take to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse relating to covered funds.” (Wikisource)

by Adena Schutzberg on 03/08 at 08:12 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

Karen Siderelis GIO at Interior and her peers (including Jerry Johnston, GIO at EPA,  Mohamad Thahir, chief architect for Oracle Spatial Technologies and Sheila Steffenson, director of federal science business at ESRI) identified challenges in using geodata at a forum on emerging technologies and the evolution of geospatial applications, held in Washington, D.C., by the American Council for Technology and the Industry Advisory Council.

Among them:

- getting non-traditional users to use the tech to make better decisions
- getting better use of existing data stores
- having a common understanding of metadata and its discoverability on the Web
- volunteered geographic information
- accountability for data accuracy on government sites

- GCN

by Adena Schutzberg on 03/08 at 06:00 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share
Page 2 of 3 pages  <  1 2 3 >

All Points Blog Newsletter

Catching geospatial news that others miss. Delivered daily.

Preview Newsletter | Archive

Follow

Feed  Twitter 

Recent Comments

Publications: Directions Magazine | Directions Magazine Francais | Directions Magazine Espanol
Conferences: Location Intelligence Conference | Rocket City Geospatial
© 2012 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved
194 Green Bay Road, Glencoe, IL 60022