The
Press-Enterprise (San Bernardino) has a reality check article highlighting how satellite imagery and other remote sensing tools are just not that helpful in finding survivors (or even wreckage) of downed planes in rough terrain. Recent efforts to find ex-Israeli paratrooper David Katz and Steve Fossett were unsuccessful even with experimental radar and infrared tools. In the end, people in the area found the two crash sites. John Pike of Global Security has the last word:
With Fossett, they mounted a pretty good-sized effort. Most people aren't worth that much money," Pike said. "I would look for the development of more rugged (crash-activated) beacons.
(Not sure what's going on with the map accompanying the article...)
Comments
November 21
One of the things that many people don’t [...]
Timothy J. Heinse about Dangermond Acknowledges GIS Professionals on GIS Day
November 21
Thanks to Jack Dangermond for attending [...]
Adena Schutzberg about UK Gov Speeds Survey, Saves Money with GIS
November 21
They used GIS to do it faster, cheaper [...]
Michael Sweet about Policy Wonks For GIS and Emergency Management
November 21
Having collaborated with emergency [...]
Big John about UK Gov Speeds Survey, Saves Money with GIS
November 21
What has this got to do with GIS??
Christopher Schmidt about Spending GIS Day with Boston Linux and Unix User Group
November 20
Heh, I was sitting there going "Okay, I [...]
Adena Schutzberg about Dangermond Acknowledges GIS Professionals on GIS Day
November 20
Discussion in this post happening here: [...]