The Cass County commissioners said "no" to the Indiana Geological Survey in response to a request for access to its parcel data. The article confuses me since at one point it says it'll cost $7000/year for the county to pay for the Web software: "for setting up and maintaining the Web-based technology." A grant would cover two years.
At another point the article says the state wants a copy. "It is always the citizens of your county who own that information," [State GIO Jim] Sparks said. "We're asking for a copy of it." The former implies (to me) the county serving up its own data (that would have a cost). The latter implies (to me) the state would take a copy (which would have a limited, if small, cost).
From what I read at the
IndianaMap site actual copies of the vector data are hosted at the The Indiana Geological Survey, so it is a copy. The "Web-based technology" is elsewhere described as "data transfer technology."
The unfortunate part of this story (and many parallel ones) is that it's still tough to convince the data providers of the benefit of sharing.
-
Pharos-Tribune via TMCNet
Comments
August 19
Hi Ian,
Fine tip, such sources are [...]
Yili about Off Topic: Teachable Moments at the Olympics
August 19
Adena,
What a great writing! I enjoy [...]
Ian Turton about Open Source Text Books
August 19
The latest version of Open Web Mapping [...]
tallpaul about Open Source Legal Ruling Means Monetary Damages for Copyright Infringement
August 19
"And, most importantly for licences such [...]
Clark Scott about Watch your words - US Patent office is giving out trademarks!
August 18
Hello,
I wanted to add a quick word [...]
mike about Autodesk/Bentley Speak to Interoperability for AEC
August 18
If you read the press release, this is [...]
Independent about MAPPS Reports Meeting Attendee Members (and their guests) Preferences in U.S. Election: Why?
August 16
MAPPS may use free speech. But as a [...]