Update 7/24: An article in today's
SalemNews.net by the same reporter includes: "The NAVTEQ maps will cost $7,875 for an annual subscription." The original article cited below still includes the $77,875 value which per comments below is incorrect.
--- original post 7/23/08 -------
I was surprised to see the county was using what are refered to as Tiger data for E-911. In testing they were not found to be very good. Further, the company that provided them (not named in a Review
article) was not responsive enough. Thus, the county will move NAVTEQ data. Cost:
The annual map subscription will cost $77,875 with quarterly updates. The cost to import the maps had not been determined at the time of the meeting.
The plan is to move to the NAVTEQ data and eventually to street centerline data currently under development.
Comments
November 20
Being a first responder.. I can say this [...]
Bruce Westcott about Spatial Data Management session
November 19
Sorry, Archie, but I ain't goin' there. [...]
Archie Belaney about Spatial Data Management session
November 19
the surest way to make even less [...]
Adena Schutzberg about GeoEye Images on Google Maps in January
November 19
Space News explains about the delay [...]
Darrin Clement about U.S. Healthiest City? Burlington, VT
November 19
Maponics is in Vermont, about an hour [...]
Adena Schutzberg about A bit of GIS history - now offline
November 18
Matt,
Good catch. I use GM as a [...]
Adena Schutzberg about Pitney Bowes Offers Silverlight-based FireLocator
November 18
Thanks! Corrected.