Researchers published two studies this week that included important maps. One highlighted the human impact on the world's oceans. A second documented the past, current and future vulnerability of the U.S. population to natural disasters. Press coverage of the first study was considerable, with the map distributed far and wide on the Web and beyond. Coverage of the second was limited to the scientific and geographic press. Why the disparity? Our editors review the maps and offer their thoughts.
Subscribe to Podcast RSS
Listen Now (to download, right click on the link at left and choose "save target as")
Read the show notes
Missed any podcasts? Want to subscribe via iTunes, Yahoo, etc?
Here's the index with all the info.
Comments
December 5
It may be the successful implementation, [...]
Jene van der Heide (sr. pm Cadastre NL) about Microsoft Eagle 1: R&D Implementation of Integrated Data/ Maps for Emergency Response
December 5
Not the technology is the succes behind [...]
FAKHRI GHONEIM about Microsoft Eagle 1: R&D Implementation of Integrated Data/ Maps for Emergency Response
December 5
thankes for the technologey
dr.fakhri
Grant about Next acquisition (after Pownce)? BrightKite?
December 5
It's interesting the Brightkite has left [...]
Rich Owings about Latest Navigon Panned
December 4
I pan units all the time, and the [...]
Jack about The Simpsons Tackles Cell Phone Tracking
December 3
Full episodes with Bart and his crazy [...]
Motivational blogger about Quote of the Week
December 3
Excellent quote. Its all about replacing [...]