Researchers published two studies this week that included important maps. One highlighted the human impact on the world's oceans. A second documented the past, current and future vulnerability of the U.S. population to natural disasters. Press coverage of the first study was considerable, with the map distributed far and wide on the Web and beyond. Coverage of the second was limited to the scientific and geographic press. Why the disparity? Our editors review the maps and offer their thoughts.
Subscribe to Podcast RSS
Listen Now (to download, right click on the link at left and choose "save target as")
Read the show notes
Missed any podcasts? Want to subscribe via iTunes, Yahoo, etc?
Here's the index with all the info.
Comments
October 10
What would be very useful is to have a [...]
Bob Thompson about Update: Siderelis Named first DOI GIO
October 10
Ho hum.
Karen Edelstein about IDC Pegs SIM Market Growth at 14.2%
October 10
Could someone explain how the $2.8 [...]
Sam the Eagle about Update: Siderelis Named first DOI GIO
October 10
In relation to Siderelis' direct [...]
Seth Grimes about Structured vs. Unstructured Data - Let's be clear on definitions
October 10
I don't see a definition of [...]
Roy about "First" Directions App for iPhone
October 8
G-Map is not available at Apple at the [...]
Stefan Knecht about Modeling Wi-Fi Dead Spots
October 8
by coincidence your post goes in [...]