Researchers published two studies this week that included important maps. One highlighted the human impact on the world's oceans. A second documented the past, current and future vulnerability of the U.S. population to natural disasters. Press coverage of the first study was considerable, with the map distributed far and wide on the Web and beyond. Coverage of the second was limited to the scientific and geographic press. Why the disparity? Our editors review the maps and offer their thoughts.
Subscribe to Podcast RSS
Listen Now (to download, right click on the link at left and choose "save target as")
Read the show notes
Missed any podcasts? Want to subscribe via iTunes, Yahoo, etc?
Here's the index with all the info.
Comments
July 3
Pretty cool application -- going to [...]
Will Turner about Starbucks Closing Stores; Some too close together
July 3
I think the issue of store [...]
Milos Sugovic about Starbucks Closing Stores; Some too close together
July 3
The decision by Starbucks to scale back [...]
Dave Smith about Update: State Licensing Board "Censors" GIS Article
July 3
Roger, just as a point of correction - [...]
xavierv about The New Gas Conscious, Distance Conscious Marketing
July 3
Hey, I liked the title of your article [...]
Dave Smith about Update: State Licensing Board "Censors" GIS Article
July 3
Having not seen the article, it's [...]
Bill Cole about Ask.com Moves to Virtual Earth
July 3
Hey! Isn't Marc Prioleau the VP of [...]