I have no issue with the phrase; I know it means "without pattern" and is used, often in blogs and in online and print publications for situations that are not spatial. That's fine. My issue: when it's used with "literally" and there no map. That is, when its specificially mean to include a spatial implication, but there is no map! Case in point:
US Cities with the Worst Hotel Rate Inflation
The data is available. Neogeographers (and regular GIS orgs) offer tools to map that data likety split. So, why no maps? Perhaps this is a teachable moment? I offer this exercise for students: find a PR/news story that notes new geospatial data, but doesn't include a map. Make a suitable map with an online tool of your choosing.
Comments
July 3
Pretty cool application -- going to [...]
Will Turner about Starbucks Closing Stores; Some too close together
July 3
I think the issue of store [...]
Milos Sugovic about Starbucks Closing Stores; Some too close together
July 3
The decision by Starbucks to scale back [...]
Dave Smith about Update: State Licensing Board "Censors" GIS Article
July 3
Roger, just as a point of correction - [...]
xavierv about The New Gas Conscious, Distance Conscious Marketing
July 3
Hey, I liked the title of your article [...]
Dave Smith about Update: State Licensing Board "Censors" GIS Article
July 3
Having not seen the article, it's [...]
Bill Cole about Ask.com Moves to Virtual Earth
July 3
Hey! Isn't Marc Prioleau the VP of [...]