The Inquirer (UK) puts foward this story of why Nokia is after NAVTEQ:
Besides being the driving force behind Cdmaone, Qualcomm is renowned for its expertise in GPS. So Nokia had the potential for being locked in a conflict with Qualcomm not just over 3G but also over GPS.
But – as our source implies – if you suddenly acquire native US based GPS technology – courtesy of Navteq, then you're not going to have to worry about paying a large tithe to Qualcomm just to put GPS into your handsets.
I don't understand this logic. Qualcomm specializes in hardware, doesn't it? "Designer and supplier of CDMA chipsets, system software, network base stations, handsets, modems, kid trackers, camera phones, MP3 players, game players..." It makes GPS chips (as do others). NAVTEQ does not make GPS enabling hardware, but rather data. Maybe I've missed something?
-
Inquirer
Comments
December 5
It may be the successful implementation, [...]
Ray about Pitney Bowes Offers Silverlight-based FireLocator
December 5
Another Typo: I think you mean "PB" [...]
Jene van der Heide (sr. pm Cadastre NL) about Microsoft Eagle 1: R&D Implementation of Integrated Data/ Maps for Emergency Response
December 5
Not the technology is the succes behind [...]
FAKHRI GHONEIM about Microsoft Eagle 1: R&D Implementation of Integrated Data/ Maps for Emergency Response
December 5
thankes for the technologey
dr.fakhri
Grant about Next acquisition (after Pownce)? BrightKite?
December 5
It's interesting the Brightkite has left [...]
Rich Owings about Latest Navigon Panned
December 4
I pan units all the time, and the [...]
Jack about The Simpsons Tackles Cell Phone Tracking
December 3
Full episodes with Bart and his crazy [...]