Special Announcement
Newsletter Sign Up
Calendar
Top Referers
georezo.net (166)
planetgs.com (63)
www.thegisforum.com (43)
www.bloglines.com (25)
bit.ly (23)
planetgs.com (63)
www.thegisforum.com (43)
www.bloglines.com (25)
bit.ly (23)
Our Points
|
Tuesday, August 1. 2006
|
Google Exclusive License for DigitalGlobe Imagery on the Web
It sounds as though this has been the case for some time, but only Google may put 10 meter or less imagery from DigitalGlobe on the Web. This from James Fee who read a post on the GeoWanking list.
To be clear, the rep at DigitalGlobe writes:
Our agreement with Google Earth does not allow for imagery to be posted to the web with less than 10-meter resolution.
There are a few exceptions - for instance media and state government - but this is a rule that is even stated in our licenses.
The writer at one point says that maybe Google might give permission as the person looking for imagery is from a non-profit. Equally amusing, the DG rep send the requestor to GeoEye!
I suppose this should come as no big shock. The U.S. DoD once bought up all the data from DigtialGlobe of Iraq (I believe I remember that right) during the war. This is the same thing, just from a commercial side. Anything is possible with enough money.
The other option was for Google to buy DigitalGlobe. Think it didn't consider that? Think it didn't consider sending up a bird? Do you think Microsoft has not thought of buying Pictometry? Or many GlobeXplorer (which owns AirPhotoUSA)? As much as GIS professionals poo poo what GYM are doing, and tout the value analysis (I do not disagree) the bottom line is that GYM are all over the data side of the equation. That's why so many people love them.
Advertisers
Polls
What's your feeling about commercial organizations that participate in kind or cash support to help in disasters and publicize those efforts?
Archives
Archives
Comments
Adena Schutzberg about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Thanks - those two issue have been [...]
jerry sullivan about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
"WaStershed"
also, the hotlink to [...]
Adena Schutzberg about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Kelly,
Sorry - just bad editing on my [...]
Kevin about Update: NAVTEQ Shutting Down Phone Map App Nav4All that Uses NAVTEQ Data
February 9
Agreed - if a user of OSM data alters, [...]
Kelly McDermott about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Adena,
North Dakota, South Dakota - [...]
Scott about Update: NAVTEQ Shutting Down Phone Map App Nav4All that Uses NAVTEQ Data
February 9
Besides that OSM data is not "perfect or [...]
Chris about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Not to be a buzz kill for South Dakota, [...]
February 9
Thanks - those two issue have been [...]
jerry sullivan about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
"WaStershed"
also, the hotlink to [...]
Adena Schutzberg about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Kelly,
Sorry - just bad editing on my [...]
Kevin about Update: NAVTEQ Shutting Down Phone Map App Nav4All that Uses NAVTEQ Data
February 9
Agreed - if a user of OSM data alters, [...]
Kelly McDermott about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Adena,
North Dakota, South Dakota - [...]
Scott about Update: NAVTEQ Shutting Down Phone Map App Nav4All that Uses NAVTEQ Data
February 9
Besides that OSM data is not "perfect or [...]
Chris about South Dakota Watershed Data Made Available in Google Earth
February 9
Not to be a buzz kill for South Dakota, [...]





Some recent content for Google Earth that I've enjoyed: Last Chance to See: Endangered species highlighted by Douglas Adams back in the 1980s — highlighted again via KML. A placemark collection of 80 moated castles in Germany. Useful, considering Germany...
Tracked: Aug 01, 16:23