Intergraph Corp. was money manager John Dorfman’s top value-stock pick in 2005. He writes for Bloomberg News.
Investors Business Daily has an interview with Halsey Wise. Sample: “That’s how we differentiate ourselves,” he said. “We lead by fusing spatial capability to security.”
The Inquirer reports that Intergraph and others may be sued for patent infringement. Details are sketchy, but the paper offers it thinks its US patent number 5,203, 002, filed in 1993 by Mr Glen Wetzel. No court papers have surfaced yet. Other defendants may include Intel, IBM, Fujitsu and TI.
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/29 at 08:47 AM |
The Press Enterprise has the story (free registration required) of the Redlands, California nursery’s history and future.
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/29 at 08:43 AM |
James Fee at Spatially Adjusted is lobbying ESRI to link ArcGIS Explorer with a task to search Mapdex (a “labor of love” index of online mapping services). Shall I offer that perhaps a task to search ESRI’s own Geography Network and its Geodata.gov (built under contract to DOI) might be offered too?
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/29 at 06:00 AM |
Just like the rest of the media, Wired is running a whole series of articles listing the top this and that of 2005. Most are fun to read, I admit. Here I want to pull out a few points that relate to the geospatial world.
1) Among the Best and Worst Pundutry Wired notes that IDC predicted “the PC market would grow by 10 percent in 2005 (which appears on track, thanks to strong notebook sales) and that RFID deployments would accelerate (true, though not as quickly as many industry analysts expected).”
2) Among the Most Predictable Stories of 2005 Wired finds Google Maps.
Google Maps: In retrospect, how did anyone bear using MapQuest’s clunky interface, and why didn’t we all realize that dragging a map would feel so good?
Of course, the geniuses at Google recognized that every American’s birthright includes not only a search engine that works, but also online maps complete with Ajax goodness, satellite views and adorable pushpins.
There are bunch of Microsoft lists out there, but I have yet to find Virtual Earth/Live Local on any of them. Hmmm.
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/28 at 12:17 PM |
Stefan at Ogle Earth is having a field day correcting an article describing how Google (as opposed to its suppliers) decides which imagery of Israel is sharing. An article by Maureen Dowd in the New York Times (she’s behind a paid wall that I guess I get past since I do pay the Times some money each year, if you pay, you can read it here) notes that after the whole snooping discussion last week, readers wrote to explain how Google changed imagery from showing Washington buildings to those that hide them. The Times later ran a correction noting that the original imagery had not been changed and in particular that Dick Cheney’s house was still not visible.
There’s sure a lot of FUD on the Google Earth front. Will is lessen its popularity? Nope, rather it will increase it!
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/28 at 08:54 AM |