All Points Blog
Our Opinion, Your Views of All Things Location

  • HOME

    About Us


    Contact Us

    Follow Us

    Feed  Twitter 


    All Points Blog

    Catching geospatial news that others miss. Delivered daily.

    Preview Newsletter | Archive

    << November 2014 >>
    S M T W T F S
    2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    16 17 18 19 20 21 22
    23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

I’m sure this has happened to many of you: someone well meaning hooks up with you and talks careers. You say: “You should talk to x.” Well, a few years ago I hooked up one such person with another acquaintance (it turns out we are all Penn Staters, but from different years) and I learned at the ESRI Business GeoInfo Summit that connection yielded a job with the City of Boston.

On a similar note, I met a very energetic senior from McGill. She’d paid her own way to the event and is still teasing out how she’d like to apply GIS and geography in her career. She’s waiting on hearing from ESRI-DC about a summer internship (note to ESRI-DC: hire her!) but I have no doubt she’ll be presenting at a conference about her work in no time. (Other folks looking for GIS internships might try the non-profit, The Environmental Careers Organization. I got my first job through ECO and can’t say enough about the group.)

by Adena Schutzberg on 05/02 at 04:21 PM | Comments | Bookmark and Share has an article that basically places much of the blame for locating challenges during Katrina on the failure of agencies to adopt the National Grid. The article describes the grid this way:

The National Grid is a mapping system based on coordinates provided by satellite imagery.

Sort of, I guess. The home page of the grid, above, does not have a definition (why?) but Wikipedia does:

The United States National Grid, officially known as the United States National Grid for Spatial Addressing (USNG), is a system of geographic grid references commonly used in United States, different from using latitude or longitude. It is similar in design to the national grid reference systems used throughout other nations. The USNG was developed by the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and is administered by the Federal Geographic Data Committee.

The big push is that its designed to work with GPS data directly (no converting).

A FEMA press sectretary is quoted in the aticle as noting that FEMA does use the Grid but did not since the responders in the southeast do not use it, but instead use adresses and latitude/longitude. There is some use of the Grid, but other FEMA reps explain its use on a wide scale is still down the road.

- via reader Duane

by Adena Schutzberg on 05/02 at 03:50 PM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

If you don’t read press releases or were at a conference yesterday you may have missed that VLS was acquired by Overwatch Systems (recently known as Sensor Systems).

Recall that Feature Analyst is a tool to extract vector features from raster data. It received a big welcome when it arrived as an extension to ArcView some years ago. More recently, the company has offered it for other platforms. (I interviewed the execs a few years ago in EOM (PDF of entire issue) Overwatch offers high speed real time tools for exploiting imagery - think mostly military - and you have a good picture.

This is a good match. From what I can tell both technologies are at the top of their respective games and clearly they go well together. Expect to see these folks at GEOINT and similar events. I do hope that the VLS offerings will still be offered in the civilian arena; they are key for everyone from utilities to local governments for exploiting today’s high resolution imagery.

by Adena Schutzberg on 05/02 at 06:59 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

Monday, May 01, 2006

The University of West Florida is advertising a new online GIS certificate program. It’s less expensive for residents of Florida, a bit more if you are in Alabama and even more outside those states.

Of interest: a laptop loaded with GIS and remote sensing “will be issued” to students in the program - for a $300 laptop fee. Also, the univeristy promotes the need for GIS professionals with this quote from (and ESRI website):

Across the country, tens of thousands of trained [geospatial] workers are needed to fill positions that are going begging.

The quote is from Emily Stover DeRocco, Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor - but the site doesn’t say that. Too bad the marketing folks decided to cite a corporate website (the univeristy teaches ESRI software) and not the federal government. The press release where she said that is online at the Dept. of Labor. By the way, it’s from 2003.

by Adena Schutzberg on 05/01 at 01:41 PM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

Last week Bill Jepson, Director of the Urban Simulation Laboratory and Chief Information and Technology Officer at UCLA School of the Arts and Architecture, showed off his Virtual LA at Harvard. (Luckily, a reader told me of the lecture or I’d never have known. Thanks Gary!)

The about 10, mostly Harvard Graduate School of Design (I think) folks, watched Jepson pilot us above and below the streets of LA examining full 3-D models of buildings, streets, subways (LA does have one) and the like. While we toured he told us how it all comes together:

With good CAD data and elevations it takes one person about 10 days to create a new building from scratch, that translates to about 60 hours per city block

newbies to the lab take about a full year to get up to full speed on adding to/changing the model

buildings and sections of the city are only updated when there’s a project (that is money paid) to do so

archetects’ models are not usually useable for addition to the model

the system is too big and complex to be licensed out, so all new additions go through Jepson’s lab

the whole model is terrabytes, but his unique binary compression makes it just gigabytes, that means among other things it loads in minutes, not hours

clients keep coming back, so he must be doing something right

He offered some interesting stories that highlight the big takeaway: this model is not for analysis (though there is a link to ArcInfo) but for human reaction. This one stuck with me:

At one point a professor at UCLA supported legislation that would require new tree plantings upon change of ownership of property. Jepson and his team used data from the past to predict what an area would look like “now” if such legislation was in place in the past. The trees were modelled such that they’d grow the right amount based on when they would have been planted. When the model was shown to the community, they were concerned about the decidious trees, suggesting that people would hide in them and jump down and mug people. The trees were changed to palms in the model and they were happy. (The legislation did not pass since realtors argued it would increase the cost of a real estate transaction.)

The other interesting story was about how this work in changing. What Jepson said sounded very much like what I’m used to hearing from Jack Dangermond about the evolution of GIS. It moved from large scale projects (small areas) to larger ones. It moved from modelling a single building to being a potential command and control center (with realtime data) for security and DHS purposes. It went from being theoretical to being practical. It went from being academic to having lives depend on it. Hopefully, it will also move from being so technical only specialists can use it to something more accessible.

A few things troubled me about not the model itself but about the social structure of it. Since so much of what geospatial technology is about these days is integrating data, I was disappointed this work while it did use raw CAD files, mostly seemed to recreate/create data. Jepson did explain that architects models are legal documents for construction; they are not meant for this sort of visualization. Further, he points out that every architecture firm has its own preferred “look and feel” and he needs to maintain a consistent one for his model.

Second, there seems to be no way for those of us outside this model and its team to participate, even by making models that might someday be useful in Virtual LA. For this sort of technology to really take off (pardon the pun), I think it needs to be less specialized. And, perhaps for now that’s not possible, but perhaps in the future?

Finally, this virtual version of a city made me think about what will happen as lay people craft 3D models in the free SketchUp and use them in Google Earth. Will it have any value? Any relevance to reality? Will we need trained specialists to craft these models so they are useful?

by Adena Schutzberg on 05/01 at 06:00 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share
Page 1982 of 2253 pages « First  <  1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 >  Last »

All Points Blog Newsletter

Catching geospatial news that others miss. Delivered daily.

Preview Newsletter | Archive


Feed  Twitter 

Recent Comments

Publications: Directions Magazine | Directions Magazine India
Conferences: Location Intelligence Conference | .Map Conference | GEO Huntsville
© 2014 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved