Ogle Earth lead me to a rumor column from AppleInsider suggesting Apple is at work on a Google Maps sort of offering for its new OS, OSX 10.x., aka Leopard. The article is from June 23.
According to sources, Apple has been working on a similar approach, but modeled after Google’s Maps feature. The technology will presumably allow Leopard users to scour the globe through satellite imagery and whisk up driving directions on the drop of a dime.
Apple has been rather quiet in the geospatial arena of late though developers offer educational, consumer and professional (GRASS) solutions that run on the machines. It’s intresting to consider such a move since Apple is not an advertising supported sort of company. In fact, it’s known for its clever advertising! It does of course have a loyal following in graphics, gaming, movies and music. Further, it’s leading the way in handheld music and video players. Full details on the operating system are expected at the World Wide Developers Conference to be held in early August.
Update: Further rumor: The new mapping system maybe used to track stolen iPods.
by Adena Schutzberg on 07/06 at 06:56 AM |
Chris Holmes has been highlighting the latest release of GeoServer (Ogle Earth) and posted the press release yesterday. He points out a few factoids that are near and dear to my interest in open source and open standards, which are worth your while to consider.
Google help[ed] fund us to do KML/KMZ support through WMS. James MacGill, of GeoTools, was the one who helped make it happen within Google, but the management is excited by supporting an open ecosystem around Google Earth. They have no direct use for it themselves, but wanted to make life easier on people looking to expose data on Google Earth, and instead of writing their own network link software from scratch it made sense to just fund an existing, solid open source server. I personally am often quite hesitant to support standards like KML that are less than completely open, but I got behind this because any user who puts up their data for Google Earth with GeoServer also makes it available as WMS and WFS, since GeoServer is ‘standard by default’.
James MacGill, recently left Penn State for Google. The folks at Penn State assured me that’d mean good things and they were right. The choice of Google to support an open source/open standards project to support KML is indeed interesting. GeoServer is OGC’s reference implementation for the WFS (Web Feature Service) specification.
Update: Is there a parallel here? “Microsoft will sponsor an open-source project to create a converter between Open Office XML and OpenDocument file formats.”
- via C|Net
by Adena Schutzberg on 07/06 at 06:31 AM |
Two issues are coming before the state public records commission related to consultant Whitaker’s win in a battle to gain access Greenwhich, CT’s GIS data. There are continuing questions about whether he can get updates and data on infrastructure considered a security risk, but those are not at issue right now.
Other questions are making it to the state public records commission. First, Whitaker maintains that a state Freedom of Information request was not replied to in timely manner, or completely. A hearing officer agreed. Should the commission agree, that could result in First Selectman Jim Lash facing a $100 fine. Lash denies any wrongdoing.
Second, the hearing officers maintains that the fees for duplication of the GIS data ($70 for one CD to $100 for a set of three CD’s) should be reduced as they do not reflect the true cost.
via Greenwich Time
by Adena Schutzberg on 07/05 at 06:02 AM |
I was just going to renew my subscription to Professional Surveyor and learned of its new editor, Tom Gibson, PE creator and editor of Progressive Engineer, an Internet-based magazine.
by Adena Schutzberg on 07/03 at 06:47 PM |
Two weeks ago we asked about your biggst complaint regading the conferences you attend. Of the 34 respondents, 44% found the events too expensive, 32% didn’t find enough new material, 9% complained of too much marketing, 6% found it didn’t meet their needs, while another 6% found them too long. Just 3% pointed to unprepared speakers.
This week we explore how much time readers of this blog spend in a 3D virtual environment. Vote on the lower right hand side of the homepage.
by Adena Schutzberg on 07/03 at 09:39 AM |