All Points Blog
Our Opinion, Your Views of All Things Location

  • HOME

    About Us

    Advertising

    Contact Us

    Follow Us



    Feed  Twitter 

  • RECENT COMMENTS
  • NEWSLETTER

    All Points Blog

    Catching geospatial news that others miss. Delivered daily.

    Preview Newsletter | Archive

  • ARCHIVE
    << October 2014 >>
    S M T W T F S
         1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31  
  • PUBLICATIONS

Friday, August 11, 2006

Joe Francica spoke with Jeanne Foust and Keith Ryden about ESRI support of standards and its work in interoperability. This conversation, captured in the podcast, was in reponse to a reader submitted question: What is ESRI doing to facilitate growth of standards-based toolsets to establish OGC services on top of an ESRI data store? This thirteen minute podcast was recorded on August 9.

Subscribe to Podcast
ESRI on Interoperability and Standards

by Adena Schutzberg on 08/11 at 05:03 PM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

Now that we’ve posted four podcasts from the ESRI User Conference and I’ve spoken to people in and outside the industry, I want to disple some of the misconceptions I heard.

I can’t listen; I don’t have an iPod.

Individual podcast episodes (programs) are saved as .MP3 files. So, if you have a player for that format, you can listen. Most people using a desktop/laptop PC have an MP3 included with the operating system or one is available for free. I’ve got a cool device that plugs into the cigarette lighter in my car that allows me to play MP3 on a thumb drive through my radio (no iPod needed). It was about $35.

I don’t have time to listen to a podcast.

Just like TV shows, some podcasts are long and some are short. We note the length of each when posting. All of our podcasts from the ESRI User Conference are about 10 minutes long.

It’s the same stuff as in the magazine, right?

That one’s from my Dad. No, actually the podcast content is for the most part not included in our articles or blog posts.

It’s just interviews with corporate folks…dull!

While we do intend to include some interviews with industry players, much of the coverage of the conference is me speaking with Joe Francica about what he saw and heard. It’s very much the sort of conversation I suspect many readers would have with friends who attended the event.

by Adena Schutzberg on 08/11 at 09:19 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

This was mentioned earlier in the year, but it’s now available, at least in Asia Pacific.  Dell now offers a Platinum Plus (ZDnet)service plan for its new dual-core Xeon PowerEdge and EMC-based storage systems. It’s geared to help grow it business user segment. What brought this the attention of GIS folks was the promise of integration with Google Earth to help users track trouble tickets in their organization.

But the real eye candy is the use of Google Earth Pro to provide real-time tracking of all service and support activities affecting your company via an Enterprise Command Centre, which taps into Dell’s own five worldwide command centres.

“Customers can drill down to the location of global sites, see current dispatches and zoom in for the detailed status of each job,” says [Tim] Griffin [regional director of Services Sales & Marketing].

The choice of the term “eye candy” will please some who consider Google Earth “just” a visualization toy with no geoprocessing. On the other hand, this sort of low level decision support interface for managers, may be just what the doctor ordered. The article goes on to note that Jacqueline Heng of Gartner feels that most companies provide about the same level of service. Perhaps such a map will be a required feature in all service offerings?

by Adena Schutzberg on 08/11 at 07:38 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

A new public high school will pop up at MapInfo headquarters in North Greenbush, NY next fall. It was created by state legislation and funding from The New Technology Foundation and the state of New York, totalling $1.2 million was announced yesterday.

Next fall about 30 students will begin in the freshman class and focus on science and technology. When I spoke with MapInfo representatives at the New York State Geospatial Summit in June, plans were afoot to get students involved with the company.

by Adena Schutzberg on 08/11 at 07:26 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 10, 2006

I’ve been digging around on this case since last fall. This week I got a less than complementary e-mail from Scott Tatro (he’s the guy who signed a deal to license the patent in question (that site provided by those who want you to license it) to other companies, so he’s certainly got a vested interest in the outcome, interview with him from 2005 here). His e-mail, I suspect sent to many members of the press, basically chastized us for not covering such and important case. Morever, he writes:

It would be very easy to review and report on the antitrust laws that clearly state that an association is not allowed to influence, in any way, the independent thinking or decision-making regarding intellectual property and its licensing.  We recognize that unless you’re going for a Pulitzer, its unlikely that your coverage takes on that topic. However; independent verification of these facts are so easy to do, don’t you owe it to your wider readership to let at least the facts come out?

He refers to the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and its participation in this matter. It funded, he says, much of the Sarkisian defense to the tune of $1.2 million. (Diane Sarkisian is a successful real estate agent outside Philadelphia who was socked with the patent infringement case for using real estate maps which violate the patent.) He suggests, I guess, that NAR is doing something illegal?

I’m not aiming for a pulitzer (I’m not even trained as a journalist!) and I found this “request” startling. I wonder how the folks who are journalists feel? I do agree this is an important issue to our community, that’s why I cover it as well as I can. However, I wonder what it means that someone with a vested interest like Tatro is prodding the press to support his “side.”

Tatro goes on:

...TReND and the NAR have now claimed that there is “substantial evidence” of prior art.  It might surprise your readers to find out that the ONLY prior art submitted in this case is the exact prior art provided as evidence by REAL itself. This MAPINFO prior art was suggested as the most likely “prior art” candidate by many companies over the past decade. However; the original founder of MAPINFO weighed in on this issue nearly 12 years ago, as an investor, board member, and mentor when EQUIAS founder Scott Tatro acquired the first US ‘989 license. The original developer of the MAPINFO software, John Haller, has also weighed-in on this issue with Scott Tatro, and further confirmed that there is no way that MAPINFO can touch that priority date.  A simple review of the expert witness reports submitted in this case will further detail that there is no prior art.

That’s why we have judges!

But, back to the state of the case. I’ve been digging around the case documents and found the history. There are some interesting twists, which frankly, I don’t understand. Here’s the history, shortened, and edited, with my comments.

July 12, 2005 - The complaint by REAL was filed against Diane Sarkisian and others.
Dec 13, 2005 - Diane Sarkisian submitted a counterclaim. According to Inman News it related to a number of defends breaking anti-trust and other laws, in particular, it alleges, the group created a “‘bottom up approach’...designed to target individual real estate agents, who can not afford to employ patent counsel or to fight expensive patent lawsuits.” Top Realty notes the countersuit includes violating “the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and Pennsylvania state laws of defamation, false light and trade libel.” The article also notes an intimidation scheme where REAL sends a letter alleging infringement, then Mark Tatro’s Equias (see above) swoops in to offer a solution, a $10,000 license.
Jan 13, 2006 - Judge Stewart Dalzell (Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia) set this timetable for motions: Discovery was due April 28, motions for summary judgement due May 12 and responses to those motions by May 26.
April 24, 2006 - Motion to extend discovery to June signed.
April 28, 2006 - A motion regard Mark Tornetta (originator of the patent and has tried twice before to get payment for it in infringement cases; both were dropped) is signed by the judge. It reads:

Stipulation and order that Mark Tornetta shall not, by his entry into or presence in the eastern district of Pennsylvania, or anywhere within its territorial jurisdiction, in connection with the agreement between Sarkisian and REAL and the resultant subpoena, be subjecting himself to the personal jurisdiction of this court in civil action no. 06-cv-0170, etc.

I have no idea what that means.
June 13, 2006 - Dates for discovery and motions are again moved up, this time to July 28 and August 14.
August 8, 2006 - New dates are ok’d by the judge: summary judgement filings are now jue Sept 11 and responses to them are due Sept 25.

So, what this means, I believe is that discovery is complete and come late September, the Judge will have all the information to rule on both sides request for summary judgement, that is, requests to side with them. No doubt, whatever happens, an appeal is likely. There’s too much money at stake for this to sit idle.

by Adena Schutzberg on 08/10 at 11:51 AM | Comments | Bookmark and Share
Page 1905 of 2244 pages « First  <  1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 >  Last »

All Points Blog Newsletter

Catching geospatial news that others miss. Delivered daily.

Preview Newsletter | Archive

Follow

Feed  Twitter 

Recent Comments

Publications: Directions Magazine | Directions Magazine India
Conferences: Location Intelligence Conference | .Map Conference | GEO Huntsville
© 2014 Directions Media. All Rights Reserved