I had a question regarding Earthcomber’s recent press release titled “Shopping Mavens Get High-Tech Reinforcement for Final Push to Christmas, Using Mobile Devices to Find Gifts in Nearby Shops”
The release said:
The Where to Wear “spot guide” downloads to Palm OS PDAs or smartphones. Using built-in maps and location awareness, a user can choose one or more items from a particular shopping list, and the device will scan through thousands of store listings to show which places have the item, and where they are on the map.
So I wondered, does that mean, which store carry the item or which have it in stock right now?
The answer from the company’s PR folks:
“Where to Wear reviews stores and lists the kinds of merchandise that you would be looking for, rather than specific inventory.”
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/22 at 02:18 PM |
Ken Sutherland, who lives in Florida, and is a geospatial professional, shared this Letter to the Editor he sent to the New York Times in response to this article, which I’ve noted in the blog in recent days.
Let’s hope that everyone in the world, as an international community, will observe all the places and activities shown on Google Earth. One of the problems with maintenance of international treaties, the surveillance required. Google Earth will improve our ability as world citizens to observe boundaries and activities in addition to our primary ability to virtually tour places which we may visit or know we’ll never have a chance to visit.
Understandably, the skills required of image interpreters can’t be marginalized as a defense requirement; however, how many times does a critical situation in a neighborhood get observed and reported by a citizen, i.e., E911? Reason for everyone to know the game, the rules, and the resources (Google Earth), for our own protection as world citizens.
If former Secretary of State, Colin Powell, had the same quality imagery available on Google Earth, he would’ve “nailed” his presentation to the UN in 2003. As presented, I’ve always maintained that the imagery of the WMD site wasn’t that clear to me, the before and after photo axis, film clarity, quality; the site wasn’t that obvious to me during his speech.
With Google Earth we now have some of the best available image resources Online and FREE! We can also act more capably as the “eyes and ears” of our Homeland Security, one of the many goals of that agency to include everyone for our own protection; or we can just fly the coast line of Scotland or any other dream destination in the world, with Google Earth on our desktops. Once someone opens a gateway ... always difficult to take back what we have been provided so freely.
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/22 at 02:05 PM |
Read this eloquently written statement from Randall Newton at AECNews.com about Bentley and Autodesk and you may see something about some of the players in the geospatial industry. (I file this under Autodesk since I don’t have a Bently category yet. That’s telling, no?)
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/22 at 02:02 PM |
This is probably the biggest endorsement for OGC in its history: “The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) has adopted the Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. (OGC) web service specification baseline, along with complementary international and industry standards, as requirements for use in all NGA production processes.”
I’ve only seen this announcement on our website (put there by NGA) so I want to be sure folks know about it.
Full disclosure: I consult to OGC.
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/22 at 01:34 PM |
Whitaker, who successfully forced Greenwich Connecticut to hand over its GIS and aerial data to him, has asked other towns for the same information. The city of Stamford said yes, New Canaan is looking into the matter. More from Greenwich Time. (Boy that’s a great name for the paper!)
by Adena Schutzberg on 12/22 at 07:50 AM |